Guy v. Baker

Filing 100

ORDER Granting 99 Motion for Extension of Time Re: 90 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents have until 10/30/2019 to respond. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 CURTIS GUY, 4 5 Petitioner, v. 6 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 7 Case No. 2:11-cv-01809-APG-NJK ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 99) Respondents. 8 9 After three extensions of time (60 days, 31 days and 30 days) the respondents were to 10 respond to the second amended petition by October 16, 2019. On that day, the respondents filed 11 a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 99) requesting a fourth extension of time, this one 14 12 days. The respondents’ counsel states that the extension is necessary because of personal matters 13 and because of her obligations in other cases. Guy does not oppose. 14 The respondents’ motion is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, 15 and there is good cause for the extension. 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that the respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF 17 No. 99) is GRANTED. The respondents will have until October 30, 2019 to respond to Guy’s 18 second amended habeas petition. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set 19 forth in the order entered November 26, 2018 (ECF No. 85) will remain in effect. 20 Dated: October 17, 2019. 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?