Guy v. Baker

Filing 114

ORDER granting 113 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) to Reply to the 111 Response to the 105 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 6/18/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Case 2:11-cv-01809-APG-NJK Document 114 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 1

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 CURTIS GUY,
4

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01809-APG-NJK
Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME

5 v.
(ECF No. 113)
6 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
7
8

Respondents.
The respondents filed a motion to dismiss on November 4, 2019. ECF No. 105.

9 Petitioner Curtis Guy filed an opposition to that motion on April 3, 2020. ECF No. 111. The
10 respondents’ reply was due on May 4, 2020. See Order entered November 26, 2018 (ECF No.
11 85) (30 days for reply). The respondents moved for a 45-day extension of time, to June 18,
12 2020, for their reply. ECF No. 113. The respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is
13 necessary because of her obligations in other cases and because of delays caused by the COVID14 19 pandemic. Guy does not oppose the extension of time. The motion is made in good faith and
15 not solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good cause for the extension of time.
16

I THEREFORE ORDER that the respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF

17 No. 113) is GRANTED. The respondents will have until June 18, 2020 to file a reply in support
18 of their motion to dismiss. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in
19 the November 26, 2018 order (ECF No. 85) remain in effect.
20

Dated: May 5, 2020.

21
22
23

________________________________
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE