Guy v. Baker

Filing 166

ORDER granting ECF No. 165 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until and including August 28, 2023, to file their response to Petitioner's reply (ECF No. 164 ). Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 CURTIS GUY, 4 Case No.: 2:11-cv-01809-APG-NJK Petitioner, 5 v. 6 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 7 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF No. 165) Respondents. In this capital habeas corpus action, the respondents filed an amended answer on 9 November 17, 2022 (ECF No. 160) pursuant to the order entered May 26, 2022 (ECF No. 152). 10 Petitioner Curtis Guy, who is represented by appointed counsel, filed a reply to the answer on 11 May 31, 2023 (ECF No. 164). Respondents were then due to file a response to Guy’s reply by 12 July 17, 2023. (See ECF No. 85 (45 days for reply) (July 15 is a Saturday).) 13 On July 13, 2023, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 165), 14 requesting an extension of time to August 28, 2023—a 42-day extension—to file their response 15 to Guy’s reply. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her 16 obligations in other cases. This would be the first extension of this deadline. Respondents’ 17 counsel represents that Guy does not oppose the motion for extension of time. I find that 18 Respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose 19 of delay, and that there is good cause for the requested extension of time. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 1 I THEREFORE ORDER that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF 2 No. 165) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including August 28, 2023, to file 3 their response to Petitioner’s reply. 4 Dated: July 14, 2023 5 ________________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?