Guy v. Baker

Filing 27

ORDER that the motion for substitution of counsel 21 is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada is discharged from the representation of the petitioner in this case. The Federal Public Defender for the Central District of C alifornia is appointed to represent the petitioner in this case. The Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California shall, within 30 days after the date this order, file a Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Petitioner, indicating the ir acceptance of this appointment, or other document indicating that they cannot accept the appointment. The requirements of Local Rule IA 10-2 (Admission to Practice in a Particular Case) shall be waived in this case. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: Curtis Guy, FPD-CD/CA)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 CURTIS GUY, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 RENEE BAKER, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:11-cv-1809-GMN-RJJ ORDER 15 16 In this capital habeas corpus action, on June 8, 2012, the petitioner, Curtis Guy, filed, under 17 seal, a motion for substitution of counsel (ECF No. 21). Subsequently, the court ordered Guy to file 18 a supplemental declaration of counsel, under seal, providing a more detailed explanation of the need 19 for the substitution of counsel (ECF No. 23). 20 21 On July 3, 2012, Guy’s counsel filed supplemental briefing in support of the motion for substitution of counsel, under seal, as ordered (ECF No. 26). 22 The court has carefully considered the material filed under seal in this case on July 3, 2012 23 (ECF No. 26), and determines that, in the interests of justice, substitution of counsel is warranted. 24 See Martel v. Clair, 132 S.Ct. 1276, 1284 (2012) (holding that an “interests of justice” standard is to 25 be applied to motions for substitution of counsel in capital habeas cases). The motion for 26 substitution of counsel will be granted, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada will 1 be discharged from its representation of the petitioner, and the Federal Public Defender for the 2 Central District of California will be appointed to represent the petitioner. 3 The Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California will be directed to file a 4 notice of appearance of counsel in this action. After that notice is filed, the court will set a schedule 5 for further proceedings. 6 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for substitution of counsel (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. 8 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada is discharged from the representation of the petitioner in this case. 10 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California is appointed to represent the petitioner in this case. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of 13 California shall, within 30 days after the date this order, file a Notice of Appearance of Counsel for 14 Petitioner, indicating their acceptance of this appointment, or other document indicating that they 15 cannot accept the appointment. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the requirements of Local Rule IA 10-2 (“Admission to 17 Practice in a Particular Case”) shall be waived in this case. 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 2 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall SERVE a copy of this order on each of the following: 3 4 5 6 Curtis Guy #33750 Ely State Prison P.O. Box 1989 Ely, NV 89301 7 8 9 Federal Public Defender Central District of California 321 E. 2nd Street Los Angeles, CA90012 10 11 Dated this 10th day of July, 2012. 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?