Maxwell v. Allied Property And Casualty Insurance Company
Filing
19
ORDER Denying 13 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
***
)
)
TONI MAXWELL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ALLIED PROPERTY AND
)
CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Iowa Corporation, dba )
ALLIED INSURANCE, a Nationwide )
Company; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL )
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa
Corporation, dba Nationwide Insurance. )
)
)
Defendants.
)
2:11-CV-01861-PMP-VCF
ORDER
15
Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff’s fully briefed Motion for
16
17
Remand (Doc. #13) filed December 16, 2011. Notwithstanding Plaintiff’s incorrect
18
claim that Defendants must establish the value of Plaintiff’s claim or alternatively
19
that this Court should conduct its own analysis to determine the value of Plaintiff’s
20
claim, the record before the Court clearly shows that Plaintiff has previously
21
demanded the UIM policy limits of $500,000. Although Plaintiff states she “would
22
have accepted less,” Plaintiff has not declared that the value of her claim is less than
23
$75, 000.00.
24
///
25
///
26
///
1
2
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Toni Maxwell’s Motion
for Remand (Doc. #13) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the party shall forthwith proceed with
4
to file a Proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in compliance with the
5
Local Rules of this Court.
6
7
DATED: January 18, 2012.
8
9
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?