Maxwell v. Allied Property And Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 19

ORDER Denying 13 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 *** ) ) TONI MAXWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ALLIED PROPERTY AND ) CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa Corporation, dba ) ALLIED INSURANCE, a Nationwide ) Company; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL ) ) INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa Corporation, dba Nationwide Insurance. ) ) ) Defendants. ) 2:11-CV-01861-PMP-VCF ORDER 15 Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff’s fully briefed Motion for 16 17 Remand (Doc. #13) filed December 16, 2011. Notwithstanding Plaintiff’s incorrect 18 claim that Defendants must establish the value of Plaintiff’s claim or alternatively 19 that this Court should conduct its own analysis to determine the value of Plaintiff’s 20 claim, the record before the Court clearly shows that Plaintiff has previously 21 demanded the UIM policy limits of $500,000. Although Plaintiff states she “would 22 have accepted less,” Plaintiff has not declared that the value of her claim is less than 23 $75, 000.00. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 2 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Toni Maxwell’s Motion for Remand (Doc. #13) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the party shall forthwith proceed with 4 to file a Proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in compliance with the 5 Local Rules of this Court. 6 7 DATED: January 18, 2012. 8 9 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?