BMW of North America, LLC v. Kortek Services, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER Accepting 19 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/7/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KORTEK SERVICES, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
2:11-cv-01909-LRH-PAL
ORDER
14
15
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen
16
(#191) entered on February 17, 2012, recommending that default judgment be entered against
17
Defendants unless they filed the Certificate of Interested Parties in this matter no later than February
18
28, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred
19
to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of
20
Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
21
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case and determines that the Magistrate
22
Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#19) entered on February 17, 2012, can now be considered as
23
moot given that Defendants filed their Certificate of Interested Parties (#20) on February 21, 2012..
24
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#19)
25
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
entered on February 17, 2012, is accepted by the Court. The Defendants and their counsel are
2
admonished to carefully comply with all procedural rules. Any further violations will be viewed
3
strictly by the Court.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED this 7th day of March, 2012.
6
7
8
9
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?