Hall v Mortgageit Inc et al
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 23 Motion to Dismiss and Granting 26 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Mortgageit, Inc. and Chicago Title terminated. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/28/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
CYNTHIA HALL,
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:11-CV-02051-KJD-CWH
13
v.
ORDER
14
MORTGAGEIT, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Before the Court is Defendant Mortgageit, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (#23). Also before the
18
Court is Defendant Chicago Title’s Motion to Dismiss (#26). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to
19
either of these Motions.
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(b), any Response and/or Opposition to these Motions to Dismiss
21
was required to be filed with the Court and served within fourteen days after service of the Motion.
22
No Response and/or Opposition has been filed by Plaintiff regarding this matter. Local Rule 7-2(d)
23
provides that the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion
24
shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion. Defendants’ Motions appear to be supported
25
by good cause.
26
1
2
3
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, Defendant Mortgageit, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss
(#23)is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Chicago Title’s Motion to Dismiss (#26) is
GRANTED.
DATED this 28th day of February 2012.
6
7
8
9
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?