Richardson v. Oppenheimer & CO. et al

Filing 53

ORDER Granting 52 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respnod re 43 Amended Complaint. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. answer due 8/2/2013; Oppenheimer Asset Management, Inc. answer due 8/2/2013; Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc. answer due 8/2/2013; Mark Weinberg answer due 8/2/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:11-cv-02078-GMN-PAL Document 52-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 1

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5

WILLIAM A. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,

6
7

Case No.: 2:11-cv-02078-GMN (PAL)

v.

10

OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.;
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.;
OPPENHEIMER ASSET
MANAGEMENT, INC.; and MARK
WEINBERG,

11

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING
MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendants.

8
9

12
13
14
15
16

For good cause shown, Defendants shall have until Friday, August 2, 2013 to
answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

2nd day of August, 2013.
Dated this __ day of ________, 2013.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DOCUMENT PREPARED
ON RECYCLED PAPER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE