Richardson v. Oppenheimer & CO. et al
Filing
62
ORDER Granting 61 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 54 MOTION to Dismiss. Replies due by 8/26/2013. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/23/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
WILLIAM A. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,
6
7
Case No.: 2:11-cv-02078-GMN (PAL)
v.
10
OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.;
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.;
OPPENHEIMER ASSET
MANAGEMENT, INC.; and MARK
WEINBERG,
11
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING
FILING MOTION TO DISMISS
MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED
COMPLAINT
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants.
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
For good cause shown, Defendants shall have until Monday, August 26, 2013
to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss.
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated this __ 23rdof ________, 2013.
DATED this day day of August, 2013.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DOCUMENT PREPARED
ON RECYCLED PAPER
_______________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?