Shields v. Airborne Veterans Services et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6

***
7

LEON SHIELDS,
8
9
10
11
12

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
AIRBORNE VETERANS SERVICES, et )
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

2:11-CV-02093-PMP-VCF
ORDER

13
14

Before the Court for consideration is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15)

15

filed March 15, 2012. Although Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion to Proceed and

16

Request for Oral Argument” (Doc. #19) on March 27, 2012, that filing does not respond to

17

the merits of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, nor does it warrant oral argument in this

18

matter. For the reasons set forth in Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15), the Court

19

finds that Plaintiff’s Complaint must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which

20

relief can be granted, in accord with Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc.

22

#15) is GRANTED and that the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of

23

Defendants and against Plaintiff.

24

DATED: April 9, 2012.

25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge