Williams v. Gold Coast Hotel and Casino et al
Filing
5
ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Extend Time to File Certificate of Interested Parties. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
SOFIA A. WILLIAMS,
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GOLD COAST HOTEL AND CASINO, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:11-cv-02112-KJD-CWH
ORDER
16
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to File a
17
Certificate of Interested Parties (#4), filed January 12, 2012.
18
Local Rule 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus
19
cases), pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the
20
disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms,
21
partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, pecuniary interest in the
22
outcome of the case. Local Rule 7.1-1(b) further provides that if there are no known interested parties,
23
other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, Local
24
Rule 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the
25
information that this rule requires.
26
Plaintiff’s Certificate of Interested Parties was due by January 8, 2012. It was not filed in a
27
timely fashion because Plaintiff did not receive notification until January 10, 2012. Thus, the Court
28
will grant Plaintiff an extension and require the Certificate of Interested Parties to be filed no later than
1
Friday, February 3, 2012.
2
Accordingly,
3
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Certificate of
4
5
Interested Parties (#4) is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Certificate of Interested Parties,
6
which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., on Friday, February 3, 2012. Failure to
7
comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions, including a
8
recommendation to the District Judge that this case be dismissed, should not be imposed.
9
Dated this 18th day of January, 2012.
10
11
12
___________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?