Sauceda et al v. City Of North Las Vegas et al
Filing
165
ORDER granting 164 Stipulation; This matter is administratively STAYED pending the outcome on appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status reports every sixty (60) days until the Ninth Circuit issues a dispositive decision in this case. The first joint status report is due sixty (60) days from this Order's issuance. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK Document 164 Filed 05/30/19 Page 1 of 2
1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 3062
2 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
702.893.3383
4 Fax: 702.893.3789
Attorneys for Defendants
5 City of North Las Vegas,
North Las Vegas Police Department
6 Officer Jeffrey Pollard
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
***
10 ESTATE OF FERNANDO SAUCEDA, by
and through its Special Administrator, Irene
11 Saucedo; IRENE SAUCEDA, individually,
and as natural parent and guardian of
12 FERNANDO SAUCEDA, a minor;
SEBASTIAN SAUCEDA, a minor; and
13 GIOVANNA SAUCEDA, a minor,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY
COURT PROCEEDINGS PENDING
APPEAL
Plaintiffs,
14
15
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-2116-APG-NJK
vs.
16 CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, a corporate
city of the State of Nevada ; NORTH LAS
17 VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, an entity
of the CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS;
18
OFFICER JEFFREY POLLARD; DOE
19 POLICE OFFICERS I through XX, inclusive,
individually and in their official capacity;
20 DOES XXI through XXX, inclusive; ROES
XXXI through XL, inclusive,
21
Defendants.
22
23
It is stipulated and agreed by and between the Plaintiffs, Estate of Fernando G. Sauceda, by
24 and through its Special Administrator, Irene Sauceda, Irene Sauceda, individually, and as natural
25 parent and guardian of Fernando Sauceda, a minor, Sebastian Sauceda, a minor, and Giovanna
26 Sauceda, a minor, by and through their attorneys, Murdock & Associates, Chtd. and Eckley M.
27 Keach, Chtd., and Defendants City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department and
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4843-1230-8632.1
Case 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK Document 164 Filed 05/30/19 Page 2 of 2
1 Officer Jeffrey Pollard, by and through their counsel, Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq., of LEWIS
2 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, that:
3
On March 30, 2019, the Court issued its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part
4 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 157).
5
On April 26, 2019, Defendant Filed its Notice of Appeal as to ECF 157, Order on Motion
6 for Summary Judgment (ECF 158).
7
The parties respectfully request that any further proceedings in this matter be stayed
8 pending the outcome of the Ninth Circuit Court Appeal.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10 DATED this 30th day of May, 2019.
DATED this 30th day of May, 2019.
11 MURDOCK & ASSOCIATES, CHTD.
ECKLEY M. KEACH, CHTD.
12
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
13 /s/ Robert E. Murdock
ROBERT E. MURDOCK, ESQ.
14 Nevada Bar No. 4013
ECKLEY M. KEACH, ESQ
15
Nevada Bar No. 1154
16 521 South Third Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/ Robert W. Freeman
ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 003062
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendants
18
19
ORDER
20
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is
21 administratively STAYED pending the outcome on appeal.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status reports every sixty (60)
22
days until the Ninth Circuit issues a dispositive decision in this case. The first joint status report is
23 due sixty (60) days from this Order's issuance.
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June
5
DATED this_____day of May, 2019.
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4843-1230-8632.1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?