Sauceda et al v. City Of North Las Vegas et al

Filing 165

ORDER granting 164 Stipulation; This matter is administratively STAYED pending the outcome on appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status reports every sixty (60) days until the Ninth Circuit issues a dispositive decision in this case. The first joint status report is due sixty (60) days from this Order's issuance. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK Document 164 Filed 05/30/19 Page 1 of 2 1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN Nevada Bar No. 3062 2 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 702.893.3383 4 Fax: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendants 5 City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department 6 Officer Jeffrey Pollard 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 *** 10 ESTATE OF FERNANDO SAUCEDA, by and through its Special Administrator, Irene 11 Saucedo; IRENE SAUCEDA, individually, and as natural parent and guardian of 12 FERNANDO SAUCEDA, a minor; SEBASTIAN SAUCEDA, a minor; and 13 GIOVANNA SAUCEDA, a minor, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY COURT PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL Plaintiffs, 14 15 CASE NO. 2:11-cv-2116-APG-NJK vs. 16 CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, a corporate city of the State of Nevada ; NORTH LAS 17 VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, an entity of the CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS; 18 OFFICER JEFFREY POLLARD; DOE 19 POLICE OFFICERS I through XX, inclusive, individually and in their official capacity; 20 DOES XXI through XXX, inclusive; ROES XXXI through XL, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 It is stipulated and agreed by and between the Plaintiffs, Estate of Fernando G. Sauceda, by 24 and through its Special Administrator, Irene Sauceda, Irene Sauceda, individually, and as natural 25 parent and guardian of Fernando Sauceda, a minor, Sebastian Sauceda, a minor, and Giovanna 26 Sauceda, a minor, by and through their attorneys, Murdock & Associates, Chtd. and Eckley M. 27 Keach, Chtd., and Defendants City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department and LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4843-1230-8632.1 Case 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK Document 164 Filed 05/30/19 Page 2 of 2 1 Officer Jeffrey Pollard, by and through their counsel, Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq., of LEWIS 2 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, that: 3 On March 30, 2019, the Court issued its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 4 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 157). 5 On April 26, 2019, Defendant Filed its Notice of Appeal as to ECF 157, Order on Motion 6 for Summary Judgment (ECF 158). 7 The parties respectfully request that any further proceedings in this matter be stayed 8 pending the outcome of the Ninth Circuit Court Appeal. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 DATED this 30th day of May, 2019. DATED this 30th day of May, 2019. 11 MURDOCK & ASSOCIATES, CHTD. ECKLEY M. KEACH, CHTD. 12 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 13 /s/ Robert E. Murdock ROBERT E. MURDOCK, ESQ. 14 Nevada Bar No. 4013 ECKLEY M. KEACH, ESQ 15 Nevada Bar No. 1154 16 521 South Third Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Robert W. Freeman ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 003062 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 ORDER 20 Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is 21 administratively STAYED pending the outcome on appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status reports every sixty (60) 22 days until the Ninth Circuit issues a dispositive decision in this case. The first joint status report is 23 due sixty (60) days from this Order's issuance. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. June 5 DATED this_____day of May, 2019. Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4843-1230-8632.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?