Sauceda et al v. City Of North Las Vegas et al

Filing 182

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 181 the Report and Recommendation, is ADOPTED in full. The 174 Renewed Petition for Compromise of Minors' Claims, is GRANTED. The funds addressed in the R&R shall be deposited into a blocked trust account with proof of such deposit provided to the Court within 60 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ESTATE OF FERNANDO SAUCEDA, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No.: 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States

10

Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe, (ECF No. 181), which recommends that the Renewed

11

Petition for Compromise of Minors’ Claims, (ECF No. 174), be granted and funds be ordered

12

“deposited into a blocked trust account with proof of such deposit provided to the Court within

13

60 days of the order resolving the motion.” The parties had until April 29, 2020, to file any

14

objection to the R&R. (Min. Order, ECF No. 181).

15

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

16

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

17

D. Nev. Local R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

18

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

19

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

20

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. Local R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the

21

Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

22

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

23

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

24

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

25

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

Page 1 of 2

1

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 181), is

3

ADOPTED in full. The Renewed Petition for Compromise of Minors’ Claims, (ECF No. 174),

4

is GRANTED. The funds addressed in the R&R shall be deposited into a blocked trust

5

account with proof of such deposit provided to the Court within 60 days of this Order.

6

30
DATED this ____ day of April, 2020.

7
8
9

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2