AEVOE CORP. v. AE Tech Co., Ltd.

Filing 490

ORDER that 466 Motion to to Reset Trial Dates is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the calendar call set for Monday, January 13, 2014 at 9:00 AM and the jury trial set for Tuesday, January 21, 2014 are VACATED, to be rescheduled upon the filing of th e Proposed Pretrial Order in accordance with Local Rule 26-1(e)(5). FURTHER ORDERED that 486 Stipulation for Extension of Time regarding Pretrial Order and Motions in Limine is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/19/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

AEVOE CORP., a California corporation,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
AE TECH CO., LTD., a Taiwan corporation; )
S&F Corporation dba SF PLANET
)
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, )
and GREATSHIELD INC., a Minnesota
)
corporation,
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 2:12-cv-00053-GMN-NJK
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Motion to Reset Trial Date (ECF No. 466) filed by

12

Defendant AE Tech. Co., Ltd., Defendant S&F Corporation dba SF Planet Corporation, and

13

Defendant Greatshield Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff Aevoe Corp. (“Plaintiff”)

14

filed a Response in opposition. (ECF No. 81.) Defendants failed to file a Reply.

15

Both parties agree that the current dates for the pretrial conference and trial date should

16

be removed from the Court’s calendar because of the numerous pending dispositive motions.

17

(See Mot. to Reset Trial Date 1:23–28, ECF No. 466; Resp. 1:26–27, ECF No. 479.) However,

18

Defendants request that the Court reset the dates only after the Court has ruled on the pending

19

dispositive motions. (Mot. 1:23–28.) In contrast, Plaintiff “proposes that the new trial date be

20

re-set by approximately 6 months to June 24, 2014, with the pre-trial settlement conference re-

21

set for June 17, 2013.” (Resp. 2:14–16.)

22

Rule 26-1(e)(5) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the

23

District of Nevada governs the timing of the filing of the pretrial order. Specifically, Rule 26-

24

1(e)(5) provides that, when the parties file dispositive motions, “the date for filing the joint

25

pretrial order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision of the dispositive motions

Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4

or further order of the Court.”
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendants’ Motion to Reset Trial Dates (ECF No. 466)
is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the calendar call set for Monday, January 13, 2014

5

at 9:00 AM and the jury trial set for Tuesday, January 21, 2014 are VACATED, to be

6

rescheduled upon the filing of the Proposed Pretrial Order in accordance with Local Rule 26-

7

1(e)(5).

8
9
10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulation for Extension of Time regarding
Pretrial Order and Motions in Limine (ECF No. 486) is DENIED as moot.
DATED this 19th day of December, 2013.

11
12
13
14

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2