AEVOE CORP. v. AE Tech Co., Ltd.

Filing 519

ORDER Granting 289 and 293 Plaintiff's Motions for Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/10/2014 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 6D before Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, prior to the Show Cause Hearing, the parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to resolve this issue. The parties shall jointly file, by 4/7/2014 a Joint Statement certifying that such a meet and confer occurred. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 03/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

AEVOE CORP., a California corporation,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
AE TECH CO., LTD., a Taiwan corporation; )
S&F Corporation dba SF PLANET
)
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, )
and GREATSHIELD INC., a Minnesota
)
corporation,
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 2:12-cv-00053-GMN-NJK
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Order to Show Cause RE: Failure to Pay

11
12

Sanctions Award (ECF Nos. 289, 293) filed by Plaintiff Aevoe Corp. (“Plaintiff”). Defendant

13

AE Tech (“AE Tech”) filed a Response (ECF No. 309) and Plaintiff filed a Reply (ECF Nos.

14

321, 323).

15

I.

16

BACKGROUND
This motion arises from AE Tech’s continued failure to pay the sanctions previously

17

imposed by the Court in November 2012 (“Sanctions Order”). (ECF Nos. 167, 181.)

18

Specifically, the Court previously determined that AE Tech violated the preliminary injunction

19

by selling its “redesigned screen protector products” and that, as a result, “a finding of

20

contempt [was] appropriate.” (Order 9:4, ECF No. 65; see also Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 66.)

21

Thereafter, the Court held an evidentiary hearing and ordered additional briefing to determine

22

the appropriate amount of sanctions to award for AE Tech’s violation of the preliminary

23

injunction. (See Order, ECF No. 132.)

24
25

After the evidentiary hearing, the Court imposed a monetary sanction in the amount of
$1,140,701.83 to be paid by AE Tech to Plaintiff. (Order, ECF Nos. 167, 181.) This amount

Page 1 of 3

1

represented the lost profits suffered by Plaintiff because of AE Tech’s violation of the

2

preliminary injunction ($1,079,760.08) and the reasonable attorneys’ fees that Plaintiff incurred

3

in connection with AE Tech’s contempt ($60,941.75). (See id.) Notably, the Court filed the

4

Sanctions Order on November 28, 2012. (Id.) Nevertheless, more than fifteen months have

5

passed and AE Tech has still not yet complied with the Sanctions Order. For this reason,

6

Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for an Order to Show Cause why AE Tech has failed to

7

comply with this Court’s Sanctions Order. (ECF Nos. 289, 293.)

8

II.

9

DISCUSSION
“Absent a stay, all orders and judgments of courts must be complied with promptly.” In

10

re Crystal Palace Gambling Hall, Inc., 817 F.2d 1361, 1365 (9th Cir. 1987) (internal quotation

11

marks omitted). Importantly, AE Tech’s disagreement with the Sanctions Order does not

12

warrant AE Tech’s failure to comply with that Order. Similarly, the interim decisions by the

13

USPTO in the parallel reexamination proceedings are also irrelevant to AE Tech’s duty to

14

comply with an order of the Court. See id. (“A party cannot disobey a court order and later

15

argue that there were ‘exceptional circumstances’ for dong so.”). Accordingly, even to the

16

extent that AE Tech believed that changed circumstances warranted reconsideration,

17

modification, or a stay of the Sanctions Order, noncompliance with a Court Order is an ill-

18

advised manner in which to assert these beliefs.

19

For these reasons, the Court hereby orders AE Tech to Show Cause why AE Tech has

20

not yet complied with the Court’s November 2012 Sanctions Order. A Show Cause Hearing is

21

hereby set for Thursday, April 10, 2014, at 2:00 PM. Both parties shall first meet and confer

22

in an attempt to resolve this issue. In addition, the parties shall jointly file, by Monday, April 7,

23

2014, a Joint Statement certifying that such meet and confer occurred and notifying the Court

24

whether the matter is resolved and whether the hearing may be vacated. At the Show Cause

25

Hearing, AE Tech shall be prepared to present alternative payment options, including a date on

Page 2 of 3

1

which payment shall commence, and, if necessary, be prepared to present evidence on AE

2

Tech’s inability to pay the sanctions.

3

III.

4
5

CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause (ECF

Nos. 289, 293) is GRANTED.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Show Cause Hearing is set for Thursday, April

7

10, 2014, at 2:00 PM at which AE Tech shall Show Cause why it has not yet complied with the

8

Court’s November 2012 Sanctions Order and how and when AE Tech intends to comply in the

9

future.

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, prior to the Show Cause Hearing, the parties shall

11

meet and confer in an attempt to resolve this issue. The parties shall jointly file, by Monday,

12

April 7, 2014 a Joint Statement certifying that such a meet and confer occurred and notifying

13

the Court whether the matter is resolved and whether the hearing may be vacated.

14

19
DATED this _____ day of March, 2014.

15
16
17

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 3 of 3