AEVOE CORP. v. AE Tech Co., Ltd.

Filing 643

ORDER granting 636 Motion to Amend Joint Proposed Pretrial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/28/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
AEVOE CORP.,
8
9
10
11
12

)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
AE TECH CO., LTD., et al,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:12-cv-00053-GMN-NJK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
AMEND JOINT PROPOSED
PRETRIAL ORDER
(Docket No. 636)

13

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended joint pretrial order.

14

Docket No. 636. Defendants filed a response that failed to address the basis for the motion and stated

15

that they would have agreed to the granting of the motion had sufficient notice been provided prior to

16

its filing. See Docket No. 641. The Court hereby GRANTS the motion to amend, ORDERS the

17

parties to confer regarding additional amendments to correct typographical and grammatical errors, and

18

ORDERS the parties to file an amended joint proposed pretrial order by October 28, 2014.

19

Although the Court has already done so in the past, see, e.g., Aevoe Corp. v. AE Tech. Co., 2013

20

WL 4701192, *3 (D. Nev. Aug. 30, 2013), the Court again urges counsel for all parties to better

21

cooperate with each other. “Obstructive refusal to make reasonable accommodation, such as [both

22

parties] exhibited, not only impairs the civility of our profession and the pleasures of the practice of

23

law, but also needlessly increases litigation expense to clients.” Hauser v. Farrell, 14 F.3d 1338, 1344

24

(9th Cir. 1994).

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: October 21, 2014

27
28

________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE