Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.

Filing 398

ORDER that 397 Unopposed Motion Regarding Deadline to Seek Attorney Fees and Costs is GRANTED. Bill for Taxation of Costs and/or Motion Claiming Attorney fees due by 3/31/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 PISANELLI BICE 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 13 James J. Pisanelli (Bar No. 4027) PISANELLI BICE PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 702.214.2100 (phone) 702.214.2101 (facsimile) jjp@pisanellibice.com David C. Doyle (admitted pro hac vice) Eric M. Acker (admitted pro hac vice) Brian M. Kramer (admitted pro hac vice) James J. Cekola (admitted pro hac vice) John R. Lanham (admitted pro hac vice) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12531 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130-2040 858.720.5100 (phone) 858.720.5125 (facsimile) DDoyle@mofo.com EAcker@mofo.com BMKramer@mofo.com JCekola@mofo.com JLanham@mofo.com Attorneys for Defendant SANDOZ INC. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE, CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00111-GMN-NJK 18 Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, 19 20 v. 21 JOINT MOTION REGARDING DEADLINE TO SEEK ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS SANDOZ INC., (Second Request for Extension) 22 Defendant and Counterclaimant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION RE DEADLINE TO SEEK ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 1 The deadlines for Sandoz Inc. (“Sandoz”) to seek taxation of costs or petition for attorney 2 fees were previously stayed by the Court until after resolution of the appeal by Spectrum 3 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the University of Strathclyde (collectively, “Spectrum”). (Doc. No. 4 391.) Spectrum’s appeal has now been resolved, and Sandoz and Spectrum respectfully request 5 that the court reset these deadlines for March 31, 2016. The relief requested by this motion will 6 serve the interest of judicial efficiency and will allow the parties time to negotiate an agreement 7 on the amounts. 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 9 On March 5, 2015, Spectrum filed an Unopposed Motion to Stay Costs and Petition for 10 Attorney Fees. (Doc. No. 390.) Spectrum’s Unopposed Motion requested that the Court either 11 (1) stay taxation of costs and any petition for attorney fees until after resolution of the appeal of 12 the Court’s judgment or (2) grant a three week extension of time for Sandoz to seeks costs and 13 fees. The Court granted Spectrum’s Unopposed Motion, holding that “[t]he deadline for 14 submission of costs or petition for attorney fees shall be stayed until after resolution of the 15 appeal.” (Doc. No. 391.) 16 On October 2, 2015, a panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed this Court’s judgment. 17 Spectrum timely petitioned for rehearing en banc. On February 12, 2016, the Federal Circuit 18 denied Spectrum’s petition, and set its mandate to issue February 19, 2016. On February 25, 19 2016, this Court signed an order spreading the Federal Circuit’s mandate. (Doc. No. 396.) The 20 parties agree that the Court order spreading the appellate mandate effectively resolved Spectrum’s 21 appeal. Accordingly, the parties believe that the stay of the deadline for submission of costs or 22 petition for attorney fees should expire. 23 The parties have engaged in discussions directed to resolving the issues of costs and 24 attorney fees without judicial intervention. The parties are hopeful that they can resolve these 25 issues without Sandoz seeking taxation of costs or moving for attorney fees. Accordingly, the 26 parties respectfully request an extension of the 14 day period that would ordinarily apply to these 27 filings under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, so that the parties may 28 continue discussions. sd-677845 1 JOINT MOTION RE DEADLINE TO SEEK ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 1 2 The parties request that the Court set a March 31, 2016, deadline for Sandoz to file a bill for taxation of costs and/or file a motion claiming attorney fees. 3 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 6 Dated this 4th day of March, 2016. Dated this 4th day of March, 2016. By: /s/ Brian M. Kramer David C. Doyle (admitted pro hac vice) Eric M. Acker (admitted pro hac vice) Brian M. Kramer (admitted pro hac vice) James J. Cekola (admitted pro hac vice) John R. Lanham (admitted pro hac vice) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12531 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130-2040 by: /s/ Thomas I. Ross Mark H. Izraelewicz (admitted pro hac vice) Thomas I. Ross (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin M. Flowers (admitted pro hac vice) Matthew C. Nielsen (admitted pro hac vice) John R. Labbé (admitted pro hac vice) Cullen N. Pendleton (admitted pro hac vice) Amanda K. Antons (admitted pro hac vice) MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BOURN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive, 6300 Willis Tower Chicago, Illinois 60606 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 AND James J. Pisanelli, Esq., #4027 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Sandoz Inc. 17 AND Michael J. McCue, Esq., #6055 Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq., #10351 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 March 7, 2016 21 22 [UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK] 23 24 (whichever is appropriate) DATED: _____________ 25 26 27 28 sd-677845 2 JOINT MOTION RE DEADLINE TO SEEK ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on March 4, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing to be filed electronically 3 and that the document is available for viewing and downloading from the ECF system. 4 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. 5 The document served is: 6 7 8 JOINT MOTION REGARDING DEADLINE TO SEEK ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS (Second Request for Extension) Executed this 4th day of March, 2016, at San Diego, California. 9 10 /s/ Brian M. Kramer Brian M. Kramer 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 sd-677845 3 JOINT MOTION RE DEADLINE TO SEEK ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?