Baudoin et al v. Lender Processing Services, Inc. et al
Filing
141
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 139 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/20/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
DAVID BAUDOIN, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00114-JCM-CWH
ORDER
14
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order
15
(#139), filed May 16, 2012.
16
By way of the proposed discovery plan, the parties request that discovery be stayed until
17
rulings have been entered on Defendants’ pending dispositive motions. See Docket entries (#54),
18
(#55), (#57), (#62), and (#81). As a general matter, courts have broad discretionary power to
19
control discovery. See e.g., Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988). The
20
undersigned has considered the reasons set forth in the parties’ stipulation (#139) as well as taken a
21
preliminary peek at the pending dispositive motions and agrees that judicial efficiency will be well22
served by staying the entry of a discovery order at this time. In keeping with the directive in Rule 1
23
to construe the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in a manner to “secure the just, speedy, and
24
inexpensive determination of every action,” the Court will require the parties to submit, if
25
necessary, a joint status report and proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 7 days
26
after the first ruling is entered on any of Defendants’ pending dispositive motions.
27
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order
1
2
(#139) is granted in part and denied in part.
DATED this 20th day of June, 2012.
3
4
5
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?