Brooks v. Williams et al

Filing 13

ORDER Granting 12 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond. Cheryl Burson answer due 8/27/2012; Brian Connett answer due 8/27/2012; Tanya Hill answer due 8/27/2012; Brian Williams answer due 8/27/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/14/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7

SHANE BROOKS,

8
9

Plaintiff,
vs.

10

BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,

11

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-cv-00119-JCM-CWH
ORDER

12
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (#12), filed
13
August 13, 2012.
14
By way of this motion, Defendants request an extension of time to file their responsive
15
pleading. Defendants assert that the extension is necessary because of staffing problems at the
16
Nevada Attorney General’s Office and potential that the case might be resolved by settlement.
17
Pursuant to Rule 6(b), the Court finds that there is good cause for the requested extension.
18
Accordingly,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (#12) is
20
granted. Defendants responsive pleading is due on or before August 27, 2012.
21
Dated this 14th day of August, 2012.
22
23
24
25
26

_________________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge