Brooks v. Williams et al

Filing 9

ORDER Denying 6 Motion to Set Forth Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7

SHANE BROOKS,

8
9

Plaintiff,
vs.

10

BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,

11

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-cv-00119-JCM-CWH
ORDER

12
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Forth Discovery Order (#6), filed
13
June 12, 2012.
14
By way of this motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court enter a discovery order. In its
15
screening order (#2), the Court indicated that a scheduling order would issue after the filing of an
16
answer. Assuming the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant, the
17
earliest an answer would be due is August 13, 2012. See Order (#7) at ¶ 7. Consequently, Plaintiff’s
18
request for a scheduling order is premature. Accordingly,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Forth Discovery Order (#6) is
20
denied.
21
Dated this 21st day of June, 2012.
22
23
24
25
26

_________________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2