Crawford v. Smith's Food and Drug Store Inc

Filing 292

ORDER denying 280 Motion for Transcripts; denying 276 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Milton O. Crawford, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 vs. Smith’s Food and Drug Centers, Inc., et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 Case No.: 2:12-cv-0122-GMN-GWF ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion for Leave to File Exhibits, (ECF No. 276), filed 10 by pro se Plaintiff Milton O. Crawford (“Plaintiff”).1 These exhibits pertain to Plaintiff’s 11 Motion for Leave to File a Motion for New Trial, (ECF No. 270). The Court denied the request 12 for new trial in its Order on December 23, 2016. (ECF No. 275). Accordingly, IT IS 13 HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Exhibits, (ECF No. 276), is 14 DENIED as moot. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts on appeal. (ECF No. 15 16 280). On April 21, 2017, the Ninth Circuit denied Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and 17 dismissed Plaintiff’s appeal as frivolous. (ECF No. 291). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 18 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts, (ECF No. 280), is DENIED as moot. 19 25 DATED this _____ day of July, 2017. 20 21 22 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 23 24 25 In light of Plaintiff’s status as a pro se litigant, the Court has liberally construed his filings, holding them to standards less stringent than formal pleadings drafted by attorneys. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). 1 Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?