Crawford v. Smith's Food and Drug Store Inc

Filing 292

ORDER denying 280 Motion for Transcripts; denying 276 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
Milton O. Crawford,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4
Plaintiff,

5
6

vs.
Smith’s Food and Drug Centers, Inc., et al.,

7
Defendants.

8
9

Case No.: 2:12-cv-0122-GMN-GWF
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Leave to File Exhibits, (ECF No. 276), filed

10

by pro se Plaintiff Milton O. Crawford (“Plaintiff”).1 These exhibits pertain to Plaintiff’s

11

Motion for Leave to File a Motion for New Trial, (ECF No. 270). The Court denied the request

12

for new trial in its Order on December 23, 2016. (ECF No. 275). Accordingly, IT IS

13

HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Exhibits, (ECF No. 276), is

14

DENIED as moot.
Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts on appeal. (ECF No.

15
16

280). On April 21, 2017, the Ninth Circuit denied Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and

17

dismissed Plaintiff’s appeal as frivolous. (ECF No. 291). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

18

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Transcripts, (ECF No. 280), is DENIED as moot.

19
25
DATED this _____ day of July, 2017.

20
21
22

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

23
24
25

In light of Plaintiff’s status as a pro se litigant, the Court has liberally construed his filings, holding them to
standards less stringent than formal pleadings drafted by attorneys. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94
(2007).
1

Page 1 of 1