Crawford v. Smith's Food and Drug Store Inc
Filing
85
ORDER Granting 69 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Discovery pending ruling on 32 and 57 Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/1/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
***
8
MILTON O. CRAWFORD,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
SMITH’S FOOD AND DRUG
STORE, et. al.,
12
Defendant,
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:12-cv-00122-GMN-GWF
ORDER
Motion for Continuance (#69)
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Milton Crawford’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion
15
for Continuance of Discovery (#69), filed on October 10, 2012. Time to file a response to the
16
Motion expired on October 29, 2012. The Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion as seeking a stay of
17
discovery in this matter pending ruling on certain motions. Specifically, Plaintiff’s Motion to
18
Reconsider (#32) the District Court’s Acceptance of this Court’s Report and Recommendation
19
and Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (#57) are pending before the District Court. Under
20
Local Rule 49-7, the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any
21
motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. To date, no response to the
22
instant Motion (#69) has been filed. Accordingly,
23
...
24
...
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Milton Crawford’s Motion Request for
2
Continuance of Discovery and Scheduling Order and Deposition Schedule (#69) is granted.
3
Discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending ruling on Motions (#32, #57) by the District
4
Court.
5
DATED this 1st day of November, 2012.
6
7
8
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?