Tillemans v. Astrue

Filing 29

ORDER Affirming 23 Report and Recommendation and Overruling 27 Plaintiffs Exceptions to Magistrates Findings and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 9 Plaintiffs Motion for Reversal is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 16 Defendants Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 01/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7

***
8
9

KATHERENE C. TILLEMANS,
10

Plaintiff,
11

vs.
12
13

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

14

Defendant.
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-CV-00127-PMP-GWF
ORDER

On November 20, 2012, the Honorable Robert J. Johnston, United States

16
17

Magistrate Judge, entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #23) recommending

18

denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (Doc. #9) and granting of Defendant’s

19

Cross-Motion to Affirm the Decision of the March 8, 2010 Administrative Law

20

Judge James S. Carletti which was affirmed by the Appeals Council of the Social

21

Security Administration on December 2, 2011.
On January 7, 2013, Plaintiff filed Exceptions to the Magistrate’s Findings

22
23

and Recommendations (Doc. #27). The Court has conducted a de novo review of

24

the proceedings above, and finds that the Report and Recommendations of the

25

United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #23) should be affirmed.

26

///

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Exceptions to

2

Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. #27) are OVERRULED and the

3

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston

4

(Doc. #23) is hereby AFFIRMED.

5
6
7
8
9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (Doc.
#9) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Affirm
(Doc. #16) is GRANTED.
DATED this 28th day of January, 2013.

10
11
12
13

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2