Almy v. Davis et al

Filing 222

ORDER Denying without prejudice 216 Motion to Compel, 219 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration, and 220 Motion for Discovery Requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4

***

5
6
7
8
9
10

2:12-cv-00129-JCM-VCF

KEVIN ALMY,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

vs.
[Motion #’s 216, 219, 220]

D. DAVIS, et al.,
Defendant.

11
12
13

Before the court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and

14

Requests for Production of Documents (#216), Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration

15

(#219), and Motion for Discovery Request (#220).

16

On November 1, 2013, Defendant Almy filed a Notice of Appeal unto Order #194. Plaintiff’s

17

Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents

18

(#216), Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (#219), and Motion for Discovery Request

19

(#220) were filed after Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (#204). After the Ninth Circuit rules on the pending

20

appeal, Plaintiff may seek leave to file these motions in accordance to Order #159.

21

Accordingly,

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff’s

23

Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents (#216), Motion for Leave to File Motion for

24

…

25

…

1
2

Reconsideration (#219), and Motion for Discovery Request (#220) are DENIED without prejudice.
DATED this 12th day of December, 2013.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2