Almy v. Davis et al

Filing 303

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 224 Motion to Reconsider and Denying as moot Defendants' 225 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 KEVIN ALMY, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 D. DAVIS, et al., 12 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:12-cv-00129-JCM-VCF ORDER 13 Presently before the court is plaintiff Kevin Almy’s motion to reconsider. (Doc. # 224). Also 14 before the court is a motion to strike plaintiff’s motion to reconsider filed by defendants. (Doc. # 225). 15 On September 27, 2013, the court entered an order requiring that plaintiff request leave of the 16 court to file any further motions, due to plaintiff’s numerous and repetitive filings in this case. (Doc. # 17 194). This order also stated that a request to file a motion “must be no more than two pages and must 18 state the relief sought and the reason [plaintiff] is entitled to such relief.” Id. Plaintiff did not request 19 leave from the court prior to filing the instant motion. 20 ... 21 ... 22 ... 23 ... 24 ... 25 ... 26 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Kevin Almy’s motion 3 to reconsider, (doc. # 224), be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to strike, (doc. # 225), is DENIED as moot. Dated May 28, 2014. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?