Almy v. Davis et al
Filing
371
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Telephonic Pretrial Conference held on 9/29/2014 before Judge Howard D. McKibben. Crtrm Administrator: Paris Rich; Pro Se Plaintiff: Kevin Almy; Defendants' Counsel: Micheline Fairbank; Court Repor ter: Kathryn French; Time of Hearing: 9:28 AM to 10:08 AM; Courtroom: 4; See attached Minutes. IT IS ORDERED, a Further Telephonic Pretrial Conference is set for Tuesday, 10/28/2014 at 9:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 4 befor e Judge Howard D. McKibben. The office of the Attorney General shall arrange for the Plaintiff to be present by telephone at the 10/28/2014 at 9:00 AM hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED.FOLLOWING THE HEARING, IT IS ORDERED, the Plaintiff's 358 Second Request for Enlargement of Prison Copywork Limit in the amount of $30.00 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENO, NEVADA
KEVIN ALMY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
D. DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
PROCEEDINGS:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:12-cv-00129-HDM-VCF
MINUTES OF COURT
September 29, 2014
TELEPHONIC PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Deputy Clerk: Paris Rich
Reporter: Kathryn French
At 9:28 a.m., the Court convenes.
Pro Se Plaintiff, Kevin Almy, is present telephonically.
Micheline Fairbank, Senior Deputy Attorney General, is present telephonically on behalf of
Defendants Eric Francher, Pamela Feil, Brandt Halling, James Keener, Veronica Meza, Terry
Nelsen, and Ruben Vidaurri.
The Court confirms this action is proceeding to trial on Monday, December 8, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.,
on the Plaintiff’s four claims set forth in Counts 1, 3, 8 and 11.
The Court addresses the [126] proof of service of Defendant Brandon Davis which reflects
service on 4/25/2013 in Sparks, Nevada. The Court and parties further confer regarding whether
the fees have been paid. The Court requests further investigation into this matter by Ms.
Fairbank.
The Court outlines the requests set forth in the Plaintiff's [327] Request for Subpoenas, [330]
Motion for U.S. Marshals to Serve Subpoenas [329] Motion for Inmate Witnesses to Testify via
Audio Visual Equipment, [364] Motion for Contempt of Court Sanctions, and [358] Second
Request for Enlargement of Prison Copywork Limit.
ALMY v. DAVIS, et al.
2:12-cv-00129-HDM-VCF
September 29, 2014
Page Two
______________________________________________________________________________
With respect to [364] Motion, IT IS ORDERED, the Plaintiff’s [364] Motion for Contempt of
Court Sanctions is DENIED.
With respect to [327] Request, [330] Motion and [329] Motion, the Court recites the Plaintiff's
Witnesses as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Dwayne Clark;
Gary Winkler;
David Sheldon;
Steven A. Haug;
Larry Eugene Smith;
Tommy Terrant;
Tracy Summers;
Billy Atkins;
Donald Picard; and
Justin Riley.
The Court inquires whether all of the listed witnesses are currently incarcerated. The Court, the
Plaintiff and Ms. Fairbank discuss the potential locations of the inmate witnesses, the availability
of the video conferencing service to be utilized for inmate witnesses at trial on 12/8/2014 and
12/9/2014, and the Plaintiff's ability to correspond with the witness inmates pursuant to the
Court's previous [340] Order dated July 22, 2014.
IT IS ORDERED, a Further Telephonic Pretrial Conference is set for Tuesday, October
28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Howard D. McKibben.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, within ten (10) days prior to the October 28, 2014 hearing,
the Defendants shall prepare a list identifying the current locations of the aforementioned
inmate witnesses and provide a copy of such list to the Plaintiff and the Court. Further, the
Defendants shall determine whether such inmate witnesses will be available via video
conferencing on the afternoon of Monday, December 8, 2014 and/or the morning of
Tuesday, December 9, 2014.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as to any witness(es) outside the prison system, the Plaintiff
will be required to effectuate service on such witness(es) and pay any related costs.
ALMY v. DAVIS, et al.
2:12-cv-00129-HDM-VCF
September 29, 2014
Page Three
______________________________________________________________________________
The Court discusses the Plaintiff’s [358] Second Request for Enlargement of Prison Copywork
Limit and the specific requirement for the Plaintiff’s complete set of trial materials to be
transported with him. The Court directs the Attorney General’s Office to ensure the Plaintiff will
have all of his required paperwork and documents at the time of trial. Ms. Fairbank confirms her
understanding.
The Plaintiff discusses his already obtained medical documents which he will require at the time
of trial. Ms. Fairbank addresses the procedure for the preparation of the Plaintiff’s trial exhibits
by her office. The Plaintiff confirms he can arrange for his family to send the medical documents
to Ms. Fairbank’s office for preparation. IT IS ORDERED, within ten (10) days prior to the
October 28, 2014 hearing, the Defendants shall compile the Plaintiff’s medical documents
and provide to the Plaintiff for review.
The Court addresses the issue regarding how many of the Plaintiff’s witnesses will be willing to
testify and the Court’s [340] Order dated July 22, 2014 IT IS ORDERED, within ten (10)
prior to the October 28, 2014 hearing, the Defendants shall provide written confirmation
indicating the form letters and materials sent by the Plaintiff to the inmate witnesses were
received by the inmate witnesses. The Court, the Plaintiff and Ms. Fairbank further confer.
The Court summarizes the Court’s orders and areas of focus this date.
Ms. Fairbank presents the parties’ stipulation for amendment of the Proposed Joint Pretrial
Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ms. Fairbank further states she anticipates the Amended
Proposed Joint Pretrial Order to be filed prior to the October 28, 2014 hearing.
IT IS ORDERED, the office of the Attorney General shall arrange for the Plaintiff to be
present by telephone at the Further Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for Tuesday,
October 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Howard D. McKibben. IT IS SO
ORDERED.
At 10:08 a.m., the Court adjourns.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: /s/ Paris Rich
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?