Almy v. Davis et al

Filing 41

ORDER Denying without prejudice 40 Motion for TRO. Denying as moot 24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction as plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this motion with 34 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/29/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 KEVIN ALMY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 D. DAVIS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:12-cv-00129-JCM-VCF ORDER Presently before the court is plaintiff, appearing pro se, Kevin Almy’s motion for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. # 40). Defendants have not responded. 18 According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, a court may issue a temporary restraining order 19 when the moving party provides specific facts showing that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or 20 damage will result before the adverse party’s opposition to a motion for preliminary injunction can be 21 heard. FED. R. CIV. P. 65. The Supreme Court has stated that courts must consider the following factors 22 in determining whether to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction: (1) a likelihood 23 of success on the merits; (2) likelihood of irreparable injury if preliminary relief is not granted; (3) 24 balance of hardships; and (4) advancement of the public interest. Winter v. N.R.D.C., 129 S. Ct. 365, 25 374–76 (2008). 26 1 In his motion, plaintiff alleges that Nevada Department of Corrections officials have retaliated 2 against plaintiff because he is pursuing a civil rights complaint against defendants. (Doc. # 40, 2:11-16). 3 Plaintiff requests the court to enjoin “defendants, their successors, agents, employees, and all other 4 persons acting in concert and participation with them from: a) any action in furtherance of prosecuting 5 plaintiff upon institutional [sic] of ‘MJ31: unauthorized use equipment or mail’ and ‘MJ 51: 6 compromising staff,’ b) all retaliatory actions against plaintiff, c) all impediments restricting plaintiff’s 7 access to the law library and courts less than that which general population inmates at SDCC enjoy, and 8 d) requiring plaintiff to suffer handcuffing through the cell door slot to shower or go to yard.” (Doc. # 9 40, 1:19-2:3). Plaintiff has also filed an affidavit to this effect. (Doc. # 40, 17). 10 Any infringement on prisoners’ constitutional rights must be reasonably related to legitimate 11 penological interests. Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987). This relaxed standard “is necessary if 12 ‘prison administrators . . ., and not the courts, are to make the difficult judgments concerning 13 institutional operations.’” Id. (quoting Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners’ Union, 433 U.S. 119, 128 14 (1977)). A prison official’s concern for prison security is entitled to significant deference. Harper v. 15 Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728, 733 (9th Cir.1989). 16 Here, plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient facts to demonstrate that plaintiff will suffer 17 “immediate or irreparable injury, loss or damage.” FED. R. CIV. P. 65. From the affidavit, it is not clear 18 that the conduct complained of is not reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. Turner, 482 19 U.S. at 89. Further, it is not clear that defendants’ actions are taken in retaliation against plaintiff. Thus, 20 the court is unable to conclude that plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury if preliminary relief is not 21 granted. See Winter, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374–76. 22 Accordingly, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for a 24 temporary restraining order (doc. # 40) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice. 25 ... 26 ... 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s second emergency motion for preliminary 2 injunction, (doc. # 24), be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot as plaintiff has voluntarily 3 dismissed this motion (doc. # 34). 4 DATED October 29, 2012. 5 6 ___________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?