Steelman Partners, LLP et al v. Sanum Investments Limited et al
Filing
43
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to cure the deficiency with respect to service of process on FKV. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of FKV for failure to timely file proof of service of process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
STEELMAN PARTNERS, LLP, et al.,
8
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:12-cv-00198-MMD-CWH
ORDER
v.
9
SANUM INVESTMENTS, LTD, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default on Defendant Fong
13
Keng Van Property Investment Company (dkt. no. 40) (“Application”), seeking the
14
Clerks’ entry of default against the sole remaining defendant Fong Keng Van Property
15
Investment Company Limited (“FKV”). Plaintiff contends that FKV was properly served
16
with the Summons and Complaint, and that FKV has failed to appear. Counsel’s
17
supporting affidavit refers to the Affidavit of Service as Exhibit 1. (Dkt. no. 40 at 3.) Filed
18
separately (dkt. no. 42), Exhibit 1 reproduces the Proof of Service on FKV that Plaintiff
19
filed with the Court on June 6, 2012, which shows that the Summons purportedly served
20
on FKV was issued to Jade Entertainment Group Ltd., not FKV. (Dkt. no. 42.) The
21
Summons does not identify FKV on its face. (Id.) Plaintiff thus has failed to offer
22
sufficient proof of service of process on FKV. Plaintiff’s Application is therefore denied.
23
Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to cure the deficiency with respect to service of
24
process on FKV. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of FKV for failure to timely file
25
proof of service of process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
26
DATED THIS 16th day of July 2014.
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?