Steelman Partners, LLP et al v. Sanum Investments Limited et al

Filing 43

ORDER denying 40 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to cure the deficiency with respect to service of process on FKV. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of FKV for failure to timely file proof of service of process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 STEELMAN PARTNERS, LLP, et al., 8 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:12-cv-00198-MMD-CWH ORDER v. 9 SANUM INVESTMENTS, LTD, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application for Entry of Default on Defendant Fong 13 Keng Van Property Investment Company (dkt. no. 40) (“Application”), seeking the 14 Clerks’ entry of default against the sole remaining defendant Fong Keng Van Property 15 Investment Company Limited (“FKV”). Plaintiff contends that FKV was properly served 16 with the Summons and Complaint, and that FKV has failed to appear. Counsel’s 17 supporting affidavit refers to the Affidavit of Service as Exhibit 1. (Dkt. no. 40 at 3.) Filed 18 separately (dkt. no. 42), Exhibit 1 reproduces the Proof of Service on FKV that Plaintiff 19 filed with the Court on June 6, 2012, which shows that the Summons purportedly served 20 on FKV was issued to Jade Entertainment Group Ltd., not FKV. (Dkt. no. 42.) The 21 Summons does not identify FKV on its face. (Id.) Plaintiff thus has failed to offer 22 sufficient proof of service of process on FKV. Plaintiff’s Application is therefore denied. 23 Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to cure the deficiency with respect to service of 24 process on FKV. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of FKV for failure to timely file 25 proof of service of process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 26 DATED THIS 16th day of July 2014. 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?