Southern Terrace Homeowners Association v. Viega, Inc. et al
Filing
145
ORDER Granting 92 Motion to Stay and Granting 98 Motion to Stay Discovery to the extent that a temporary stay is entered pending a decision concerning whether this action will be transferred for consolidated pre-trial proceedings to Chief Judge Jones and Magistrate Judge George W. Foley. Counsel for the parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days of decision on the request to transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 07/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SOUTHERN TERRACE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
VIEGA, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00206-JCM-PAL
ORDER
(Mot. To Stay - Dkt. #92)
(Mot. To Stay - Dkt. #98)
The court conducted a hearing on July 10, 2012, on Third-Party Defendant Ferguson
14
Enterprises, Inc.’s Request for Stay of Scheduling Order (Dkt. #92), Vanguard Piping System, Inc.’s, et
15
al. Motion to Stay Discovery (Dkt. #98). Troy Isaacson and Sergio Salzano were present on behalf of
16
the Plaintiff. Peter Brown, Amanda Yen, Gil Glancz, Howard Lieber, Tom Fuller, Jennifer Arledge,
17
Brian Ure and Gustia Kieloom were present on behalf of the Defendants. The court considered the
18
moving and responsive papers (Dkt. ## 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 109, 128, 129 and 136), and the
19
arguments of counsel at the hearing.
20
The hearing on these motions was set after the Omnibus hearing scheduled by Chief Judge
21
Jones on a related yellow-brass case held June 21, 2012 in Waterfall v Viega, 2:11-cv-1498 RCJ-GWF.
22
During oral argument, Vangard’s counsel stated that Chief Judge Jones had already agreed that the
23
claims against the product manufacturers should be severed from the majority of the other claims and
24
that discovery should proceed on different tracks. However, at this time, no written order has been
25
entered regarding that ruling. Counsel for all parties agree that this case should be transferred to Chief
26
Judge Jones with the other related cases before him (2:08-cv-01223-RCJ-GWF; 2:11-cv-00783-RCJ-
27
CWH; 2:11-cv-00812-RCJ-CWH; 2:11-cv-00830-RCJ-CWH). Counsel also agree that a single
28
discovery plan and scheduling order should be entered in all the related cases.
1
IT IS ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Motions (Dkt. #92, 98) are GRANTED to the extent that a temporary stay is
3
entered pending a decision concerning whether this action will be transferred for
4
consolidated pre-trial proceedings to Chief Judge Jones and Magistrate Judge George W.
5
Foley.
6
7
8
2.
Counsel for the parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed discovery plan and
scheduling order within 14 days of decision on the request to transfer.
Dated this 10th day of July, 2012.
9
10
11
________________
______________________________________
__
__
_____ __
_____________________
__
__ __ ___
Peggy A. Leen
Peggy A. Leen
e y
ee
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?