Joseph et al v. New Albertson's, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER that Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than January 14, 2013. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed for plaintiffs failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/3/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MICHELE A. JOSEPH, individually,
DEMETRIUS JOSEPH, individually,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NEW ALBERTSON’S, INC., dba
)
SAV-ON DRUGS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00262-JCM-GWF
ORDER
14
15
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by
16
LR 26-1(e)(5). The Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#16) filed August 10, 2012, required
17
the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than December 12, 2012.
18
There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
19
IT IS ORDERED that
20
1.
Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies
21
with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than January 14,
22
2013. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up
23
to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint
24
be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
1
2
3
2.
The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections
thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.
DATED this 3rd day of January, 2013.
4
5
6
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?