Jones v. Las Vegas Valley Water District et al

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 18 Defendant's Motion for Exception to Requirement that Carrier be in Attendance at Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/25/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4

***

5
6
7

TERRIS R. JONES SR.,

8
9

Plaintiff,

2:12-cv -00282-KJD-CWH
ORDER

vs.

10

LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, et

11

al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Exception to Requirement that Carrier be in

15

Attendance at Settlement Conference (dkt. 18). To date an opposition has not been filed. Local Rule 7-

16

2(d) states that “[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion

17

shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.”

18
19
20

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Exception to
Requirement that Carrier be in Attendance at Settlement Conference (dkt. 18) is Granted.
DATED this 25th day of April, 2012.

21
22
23
24
25

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE