Maughan v. Nye County Sheriffs Office et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Clerk Shall Enter Judgment Accordingly. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/8/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 ROBERT A. MAUGHAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. 8 NYE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 2:12-cv-00327-KJD-RJJ ORDER 11 This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 17, 2012, the court 12 issued an order screening plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 6.) The order was mailed to plaintiff at his 13 address of record. On August 1, 2012, the order mailed to plaintiff was returned to the court as 14 undeliverable. (ECF No. 8.) After plaintiff updated his address on October 18, 2012, (ECF No. 9), the 15 court remailed the screening order and complaint. Again, the mail was returned to the court as 16 undeliverable. (ECF No. 11.) 17 Pursuant to Rule 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals, a pro se litigant is 18 required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. A litigant’s failure to do 19 so may result in dismissal of the action. Local Special Rule 2-2. Accordingly, the court dismisses this 20 action without prejudice pursuant to Local Special Rule 2-2. 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk SHALL ENTER judgment accordingly and close 23 24 this case. DATED: November 8, 2012. 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?