Maughan v. Nye County Sheriffs Office et al
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Clerk Shall Enter Judgment Accordingly. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/8/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
ROBERT A. MAUGHAN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
vs.
8
NYE COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
2:12-cv-00327-KJD-RJJ
ORDER
11
This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 17, 2012, the court
12
issued an order screening plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 6.) The order was mailed to plaintiff at his
13
address of record. On August 1, 2012, the order mailed to plaintiff was returned to the court as
14
undeliverable. (ECF No. 8.) After plaintiff updated his address on October 18, 2012, (ECF No. 9), the
15
court remailed the screening order and complaint. Again, the mail was returned to the court as
16
undeliverable. (ECF No. 11.)
17
Pursuant to Rule 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals, a pro se litigant is
18
required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. A litigant’s failure to do
19
so may result in dismissal of the action. Local Special Rule 2-2. Accordingly, the court dismisses this
20
action without prejudice pursuant to Local Special Rule 2-2.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk SHALL ENTER judgment accordingly and close
23
24
this case.
DATED: November 8, 2012.
25
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?