Halpern v. Lightyear Network Solutions, Inc

Filing 32

ORDER Setting a Scheduling Hearing for 4/11/2013 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe re 30 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 ALDEN HALPERN, 7 Plaintiff(s), 8 vs. 9 LIGHTYEAR NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., 10 Defendant(s). 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-00340-JCM-NJK ORDER SETTING HEARING 12 On July 3, 2012, the parties conducted their Rule 26(f) conference in this matter. See Docket 13 No. 14. The parties subsequently filed a proposed discovery plan to the Magistrate Judge previously 14 assigned to this case, see id., which was not signed by that Magistrate Judge. The parties have now 15 filed an amended proposed discovery plan seeking a discovery period ending on October 11, 2013. 16 See Docket No. 30. The amended proposed discovery plan indicates that no discovery has taken 17 place other than the exchange of initial disclosures. Id. at 1. The Court hereby ORDERS counsel 18 for the parties to appear for a scheduling hearing on April 11, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3C. 19 Counsel shall be prepared to discuss at the hearing, the following: (1) the reason(s) no 20 discovery (other than initial disclosures) has taken place in the nine months since the Rule 26(f) 21 conference was held, cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1) (formal discovery prohibited until the parties hold 22 the Rule 26(f) conference); and (2) the efforts, if any, the parties made to contact the Court 23 regarding the continued pendency of the parties’ first proposed discovery plan. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: April 5, 2013 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?