Martinez et al v. PRLAP, INC et al

Filing 34

ORDER that 33 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of Bankruptcy Proceedings in Title 11 is GRANTED to the extent that this case is stayed as to discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 21 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Hearing on Pend ing Motions is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 24 Defendants' Proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 6/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8

DANIEL G. MARTINEZ, etc., et al.,

9

Plaintiff,

10

vs.

11

PRLAP, INC. TRUSTEE, et al.,

12

Defendant,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-cv345-RCJ-RJJ

ORDER

13
This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of
14
Bankruptcy Proceedings in Title 11 (#33).
15
The Court having reviewed the Motion (#33) and good cause appearing therefore,
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of
17
18
19

Bankruptcy Proceedings in Title 11 (#33) is GRANTED to the extent that this case is stayed
as to discovery until a decision is entered by the Court on all pending motions.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Hearing on

20
21

Pending Motions (#21) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in light of the stay entered
above.

22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Proposed Joint Discovery Plan and
23
24

Scheduling Order (#24) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in light of the stay entered
above.

25

DATED this 27th

day of June, 2012.

26
27
28

ROBERT J. JOHNSTON
ERT JOHNSTON
NS
NSTO
United States Magistrate Judge
d
Magistrate
t