Hernandez v. Indymac Bank et al
Filing
148
ORDER that the Clerk of Court must unseal Plaintiff's 146 Ex Parte Request to Clarify Order Filed 2/1/2016 Referencing Request to Modify Order on Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/10/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
JOSE HERNANDEZ,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
INDYMAC BANK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00369-MMD-CWH
ORDER
11
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Hernandez’s Ex Parte Request to Clarify Order
12
Filed 2/1/2016 Referencing Request to Modify Order on Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s
13
Expert Report (ECF No. 146), filed on February 5, 2016.
14
Local Rule 7-5(b) provides that “[a]ll ex parte motions, applications or requests shall
15
contain a statement showing good cause why the matter was submitted to the Court without notice
16
to all parties.” Local Rule 7-5(c) further provides that “[m]otions, applications or requests may be
17
submitted ex parte only for compelling reasons . . . .” The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion
18
and finds that Plaintiff does not demonstrate good cause or compelling reasons why the motion was
19
submitted to the court without notice to all parties. The Court therefore declines to consider this
20
motion on an ex parte basis and will issue an order jointly addressing this motion and Plaintiff’s
21
other pending motion (ECF No. 142).
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Clerk of Court must unseal Plaintiff Jose Hernandez’s
23
Ex Parte Request to Clarify Order Filed 2/1/2016 Referencing Request to Modify Order on
24
Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Expert Report (ECF No. 146).
25
DATED: February 10, 2016
26
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?