Securities and Exchange Commission v. Prime Star Group, Inc. et al
Filing
91
ORDER that 90 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam is granted. Judgment Debtor Exam set for 5/9/2018 at 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr.. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be served upon Defendant at least 14 calendar days before the judgment debtor examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
AND
Case No. 2:12-cv-00371-APG-GWF
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
PRIME STAR GROUP, et al.,
11
12
13
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 87) and Motion
14
for Judgment Debtor Exam (ECF No. 90), filed on March 26, 2018.
15
Memorandum of Points and Authorities (ECF No. 88) on March 26, 2018.
Plaintiff filed its
16
Plaintiff requests that Defendant Kevin Carson be ordered to appear for a judgment debtor
17
examination before a United States Magistrate Judge at a time and place set by the Court pursuant
18
to Nevada Revised Statute § 21.270. On May 15, 2013, the Court entered judgment against
19
Defendant Carson, and on May 19, 2014, the Court ordered Defendant to pay $131,121.02 in
20
disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a civil penalty in the amount of $113,866. See ECF
21
Nos. 80, 81. Nevada Revised Statute § 21.270 provides that the Court shall, after the entering of
22
the judgment, order the judgment debtor to appear for the examination.
23
With good cause appearing, the Court orders Defendant Carson to appear for a judgment
24
debtor examination. Plaintiff has not made an adequate showing that there is a need for a United
25
States Magistrate Judge to preside over the judgment debtor examination. Defendant Carson shall
26
appear before this court on May 9, 2018 at 9:30 am in Courtroom 3A and shall be sworn to tell
27
the truth and give testimony at the judgment debtor examination. Subject to other arrangements
28
that the parties may agree upon, the judgment debtor examination will take place at the offices of
1
1
Plaintiff’s counsel located in Las Vegas, Nevada immediately after appearing before this court. If
2
issues arise that require a ruling by the Court, the Court will make itself available to hear the
3
requests either telephonically or through a hearing.
4
Plaintiff further requests that Defendant Carson respond to Plaintiff’s post-judgment
5
discovery requests in the form of interrogatories and document requests. Plaintiff represents that
6
the parties participated in a meet and confer conference regarding the discovery requests and
7
agreed to grant an extension of time for Defendant to respond. See ECF No. 88, pg 3. Plaintiff
8
further represents that Defendant Carson failed to respond to the discovery requests. Id. The Court
9
will refrain from ruling on Plaintiff’s motion to compel to allow Defendant an opportunity to file
10
an opposition. If the parties cannot reach an agreement regarding the discovery requests prior to
11
the judgment debtor examination, the Court will set a hearing on the motion. Accordingly,
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam (ECF No.
13
90) is granted. Defendant Carson shall appear before this Court on May 9, 2018 at 9:30 am in
14
Courtroom 3A and shall be sworn to tell the truth and give testimony at the judgment debtor
15
examination. Subject to other arrangements that the parties may agree upon, the judgment debtor
16
examination will take place at the offices of Plaintiff’s counsel located in Las Vegas, Nevada
17
immediately after appearing before this court
18
19
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be served upon
Defendant at least 14 calendar days before the judgment debtor examination.
Dated this 5th day of April, 2018.
21
22
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?