Redeker v. Neven et al
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 23 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Petition. Petitioner shall have 90 days to file and serve second amended petition. Respondents shall have 30 days after service within which to answer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitio ner shall have 30 days to serve reply to answer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be forwarded - for this case - to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
ARIE ROBERT REDEKER,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
D.W. NEVEN, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________/
2:12-cv-00397-KJD-GWF
ORDER
13
14
In this habeas corpus action, on June 1, 2012, counsel appeared on behalf of petitioner
15
(ECF No. 15) and the Court issued a scheduling order granting petitioner ninety days to file an
16
amended petition (ECF No. 16). On August 8, 2012, petitioner filed his amended petition and
17
exhibits along with a motion to file a second amended petition (ECF No. 23). Petitioner explains
18
that he filed the amended petition in order to present timely notice of the factual basis of all potential
19
claims, including all claims petitioner has presented to the Nevada state courts in order to avoid any
20
negative effects of the statute of limitation as discussed in the United States Supreme Court’s
21
holdings in Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 416 (2005) and Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644 (2005).
22
He also explains that he would require another ninety days to file the second amended petition,
23
which was necessary because of the complexity of the case and because counsel did not “have a full
24
opportunity to detail, investigate, and discuss” the claims with the petitioner. Motion, p. 2.
25
26
A petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal court may be amended or supplemented
according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 28 U.S.C. § 2242. The Federal Rules of Civil
1
Procedure allow a party to amend its pleading once as a matter of course if it is filed within 21 days
2
of the original filing date or within 21 days of service of the pleading which requires a response.
3
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). However, given the time line proposed by petitioner, leave of the Court is
4
required, although it should be freely granted in the interests of justice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a(2).
5
Good cause appearing, the motion shall be granted.
6
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner shall have ninety (90) days, to file
7
and serve a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, which shall include all known
8
grounds for relief (both exhausted and unexhausted). Respondents shall have thirty (30) days after
9
service of a second amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended
10
petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have thirty (30) days from
11
the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, or otherwise respond to,
12
petitioner’s original petition.
13
14
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if and when respondents file an answer,
petitioner shall have thirty (30) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that any additional state court record exhibits filed by
16
the parties herein shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number
17
or letter. The CM/ECF attachments that are filed shall further be identified by the number or
18
numbers (or letter or letters) of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state
19
court record exhibits shall be forwarded – for this case – to the staff attorneys in Reno.
20
DATED: August 21, 2012
21
22
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?