Saavedra v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER that 5 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendants. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 8/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 MARIA FIDELIS SAAVEDRA, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 CHICAGO TITLE, et al., 16 Case No. 2:12-CV-00407-KJD-CWH Defendants. ORDER 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (#5). Plaintiffs have not included a proposed amended complaint with their motion as required by Local Rule 15-1. On July 16, 2012, the Court notified (#4) Plaintiffs of its intent to dismiss the Complaint if 21 proof of service was not filed on or before August 15, 2012. No proof of service has been filed. 22 Plaintiffs’ Motion seeking leave to amend does not provide any explanation for their failure to 23 comply with the service requirements. The Court will not use its discretion to grant Plaintiff’s 24 Motion for Leave to Amend when Defendants have not been timely served and where Plaintiffs have 25 provided no indication that they would serve an amended complaint in compliance with this Court’s 26 1 order. Accordingly, dismissal is appropriate. If Plaintiffs wish to pursue their claims, they are 2 directed to file a new action. 3 4 5 6 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (#5) is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendants. DATED this 21st day of August 2012. 8 9 10 11 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?