Butter IPH, LLC v. Sanchez

Filing 20

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 14 Motion to Reopen Case. Granting 19 Ex Parte Motion for enforcement of default judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/11/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 BUTTER IPH, LLC, 8 9 2:12-CV-445 JCM (VCF) Plaintiff(s), 10 v. 11 JAYSON SANCHEZ, 12 Defendant(s). 13 14 ORDER 15 Presently before the court are two motions filed by plaintiff. No responses have been filed 16 to either motion. Plaintiff’s first motion seeks to reopen the case and for an order to show cause to 17 find eNom, Inc. (“eNom”) in contempt of court. (Doc. # 14). Plaintiff’s second motion is an ex 18 parte motion for enforcement of judgment. (“Doc. # 19). 19 I. Background 20 Plaintiff filed a complaint on March 16, 2012, alleging claims of trademark infringement, 21 trademark dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act against defendants Jayson Sanchez 22 and 1Oak Entertainment Group. (See doc. # 1, Compl.). Plaintiff made substantial attempts to 23 effectuate service, but defendant Sanchez evaded service. (See doc. # 6). This court granted service 24 by publication. (See doc. # 8). 25 Defendant refused to litigate this suit. Plaintiff properly filed a motion for entry of clerk’s 26 default, which was granted. (See docs. ## 9-10). Plaintiff then filed a motion with the court for 27 entry of a default, which this court granted. (See docs. # 11-12). In its judgment, the court found 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 that “[t]he trademarks used by defendants are confusingly similar and thus could negatively affect 2 plaintiff’s goodwill and reputation.” (Doc. # 12). The court also “enjoined [defendants] from using 3 <1oakmusic.com> and the Twitter account at https://twitter.com/#1/oakMusic, or any confusingly 4 similar marks or domain names.” (Id.). 5 After judgment was entered, plaintiff continued to monitor the enjoined sites. Defendant 6 continued to use the site <1oakmusic.com> for approximately one month, but it appears that the site 7 has been taken down. A search revealed that eNom was the registrar for the <1oakmusic.com> 8 domain name. Plaintiff sent a copy of the injunctive order to the legal department at eNom and 9 demanded that eNom either terminate or transfer the domain name. eNom refused. Plaintiff then 10 filed the instant motions. 11 II. Discussion 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 70 provides that “if a judgment requires a party to . . . 13 perform any [ ] specific act and the party fails to comply within the time specified, the court may 14 order the act to be done – at the disobedient party’s expense – by another person appointed by the 15 court. When done, the act has the same effect as if done by the party.” The rule also provides that 16 the court “may enter a judgment divesting any party’s title and vesting it in others. That judgment 17 has the effect of a legally executed conveyance.” 18 Pursuant to Rule 70, the court finds it appropriate to divest eNom, or any other third party, 19 of the infringing website and requiring the relevant domain name registries and domain name 20 registrars to transfer ownership of the infringing domain name to plaintiff. 21 Plaintiff also moves the court for an order to show cause, to find eNom in contempt, and to 22 sanction eNom. The “court has wide latitude in determining whether there has been contemptuous 23 defiance of its order.” Gifford v. Heckler, 741 F.2d 263, 266 (9th Cir. 1984). Further, courts “retain[ 24 ] discretion to establish appropriate sanctions.” United States v. Bright, 596 F.3d 683, 694 (9th Cir. 25 2010). The court does not find it appropriate to issue sanctions or order a representative of eNom 26 to appear at this time. 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2- 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to 3 reopen case (doc. # 14) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 4 consistent with the foregoing. 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s ex parte motion for enforcement of default judgment (doc. # 19) be, and the same hereby is GRANTED. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the infringing domain 8 <1oakmusic.com> be transferred to plaintiff as new owner. The domain registry eNom, Inc., and 9 any other entity or individual with the authority and ability to affect this transfer, shall fully 10 cooperate in the transfer of the infringing domain name <1oakmusic.com> to plaintiff Butter IPH, 11 LLC. 12 DATED December 11, 2012. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?