Branch Banking and Trust Company vs Jones/Windmill, LLC, et al.
Filing
165
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the parties' 138 Stipulation to Facts Regarding the Sale Price Garnered at the Trustee's Sale be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 02/09/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY,
ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
11
v.
JONES/WINDMILL, LLC, et al.,
Defendant(s).
12
13
Case No. 2:12-CV-452 JCM (GWF)
Presently before the court is plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company and defendants
14
Jones/Windmill, LLC, et al.’s stipulation to facts regarding the sale price garnered at the trustee’s
15
sale. (Doc. # 138).
16
The parties stipulate to the fact that the real property that is the subject of this litigation
17
was sold at a non-judicial trustee’s sale to the plaintiff for a credit bid in the amount of $296,000.
18
The parties did not include an order with the stipulation, so it was not granted. Since filing the
19
stipulation, the parties have each submitted documents indicating that they agree to the foregoing
20
21
facts regarding the trustee’s sale. (See, e.g., doc. ## 162, 163). The parties also attended an
evidentiary hearing conducted by Judge Foley in which there was no dispute about the trustee’s
sale facts. (See doc. ## 156, 159). The stipulation is thus moot.
22
Accordingly,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the parties’ stipulation
24
to facts regarding the sale price garnered at the trustee’s sale (doc. # 138) be, and the same hereby
25
is, DENIED as moot.
26
DATED February 9, 2016.
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
_____________________________
_ __
_
__________________________________________
UN ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ED
JUD
UNITED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?