McCorkle v. Astrue
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 15 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Marc V. Kalagian
Attorney at Law: 4460
Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP
211 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 420
Long Beach, CA 90802
Tel.: (562)437-7006
Fax: (562)432-2935
E-mail: rohlfing.kalagian@rksslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jennifer A. McCorkle
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
JENNIFER A. MCCORKLE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant.
17
) Case No.: 2:12-CV-00461 JCM-CWH
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
TO THE HONORABLE JAMES C, MAHAN, DISTRICT JUDGE OF THE
19
20
DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Jennifer A. McCorkle
21
22
23
24
25
26
(“Plaintiff”) and Michael J. Astrue as the Commissioner of Social Security
///
///
///
///
-1-
1
(“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its
2
own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to
3
the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B).
4
DATE: December 13, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
5
ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP
6
/s/ Marc V. Kalagian
BY: __________________
Marc V. Kalagian
Attorney for plaintiff Jennifer A. McCorkle
7
8
9
DATE: December 17, 2012
10
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
Assistant United States Attorney
11
/s/ Carlos A. Gonzalez
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security
(Per e-mail authorization)
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
DATE:
December 18, 2012
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE MIRANDA C. DU
JAMES M. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
___________
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?