McCorkle v. Astrue

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 15 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Marc V. Kalagian Attorney at Law: 4460 Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP 211 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 420 Long Beach, CA 90802 Tel.: (562)437-7006 Fax: (562)432-2935 E-mail: rohlfing.kalagian@rksslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Jennifer A. McCorkle 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 JENNIFER A. MCCORKLE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 ) Case No.: 2:12-CV-00461 JCM-CWH ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 TO THE HONORABLE JAMES C, MAHAN, DISTRICT JUDGE OF THE 19 20 DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Jennifer A. McCorkle 21 22 23 24 25 26 (“Plaintiff”) and Michael J. Astrue as the Commissioner of Social Security /// /// /// /// -1- 1 (“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its 2 own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to 3 the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B). 4 DATE: December 13, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 5 ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP 6 /s/ Marc V. Kalagian BY: __________________ Marc V. Kalagian Attorney for plaintiff Jennifer A. McCorkle 7 8 9 DATE: December 17, 2012 10 DANIEL G. BOGDEN Assistant United States Attorney 11 /s/ Carlos A. Gonzalez Carlos A. Gonzalez Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 DATE: December 18, 2012 ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE MIRANDA C. DU JAMES M. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 ___________ 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?