McCorkle v. Astrue

Filing 3

ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk to file Complaint and serve Commissioner of Social Security Administration by certified mail. Summons to be issued to U.S. Attorney and deliver to U.S. Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 JENNIFER A. MCCORKLE, 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) 12 Case No. 2:12-cv-00461-JCM-CWH ORDER This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Plaintiff’s Application for 13 Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1), filed March 19, 2012. 14 I. 15 In Forma Pauperis Application Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing an inability to prepay fees 16 and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be 17 granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 18 II. Screening the Complaint Upon granting a request to proceed in forma pauperis, a court must additionally screen the 19 20 complaint pursuant to § 1915(a). Federal courts are given the authority dismiss a case if the action is 21 legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 22 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). When a 23 court dismisses a complaint under § 1915(a), the plaintiff should be given leave to amend the complaint 24 with directions as to curing its deficiencies, unless it is clear from the face of the complaint that the 25 deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 26 1995). 27 28 Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Review under Rule 12(b)(6) is essentially a ruling on a question of law. North Star Intern. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, 720 F.2d 578, 580 (9th Cir. 1 1983). In considering whether the plaintiff has stated a claim upon which relief can be granted, all 2 material allegations in the complaint are accepted as true and are to be construed in the light most 3 favorable to the plaintiff. Russell v. Landrieu, 621 F.2d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 1980). Allegations of a 4 pro se complaint are held to less stringent standards than formal pleading drafted by lawyers. Haines v. 5 Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam). 6 Plaintiff’s complaint challenges a decision by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) 7 denying her disability benefits. Prior to filing suit, a plaintiff must exhaust administrative remedies. 8 See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); see also Bass v. Social Sec. Admin., 872 F.2d 832, 833 (9th Cir. 1989) (per 9 curium) (“Section 405(g) provides that a civil action may be brought only after (1) the claimant has 10 been party to a hearing held by the Secretary, and (2) the Secretary has made a final decision on the 11 claim”). Generally, if the SSA denies a claimant’s application for disability benefits, he can request 12 reconsideration of the decision. If the claim is denied at the reconsideration level, a claimant may 13 request a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). If the ALJ denies the claim, a claimant 14 may request review of the decision by the Appeals Council. If the Appeals Council declines to review 15 the ALJ’s decision, a claimant may then request judicial review. See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 404, 416. 16 Once a plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies, she can obtain judicial review of an 17 SSA decision denying benefits by filing suit within sixty (60) days after notice of a final decision. Id. 18 An action for judicial review of a determination by the SSA must be brought “in the district court of the 19 United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides.” Id. A district court can affirm, 20 modify, reverse, or remand a decision if Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies and timely 21 filed a civil action. However, judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits is 22 limited to determining: (a) whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the 23 findings of the Commissioner; and (b) whether the correct legal standards were applied. Morgan v. 24 Commissioner of the Social Security Adm., 169 F.3d 595, 599 (9th Cir. 1999). 25 Plaintiff alleges that on January 18, 2012, the Appeals Council denied her request for review, 26 and the ALJ’s decision became the final decision of the Commissioner. Thus, it appears Plaintiff has 27 exhausted his administrative remedies. Accordingly, 28 IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1 1. 2 3 Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall not be required to pay the filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00). 2. Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of 4 prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of a security therefor. This 5 Order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall not extend to the issuance of 6 subpoenas at government expense. 7 3. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint. 8 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security 9 Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail to: 10 (1) General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Room 611, Altmeyer Bldg., 6401 11 Security Blvd., Baltimore, Maryland 21235; and (2) the Attorney General of the United 12 States, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4400, 13 Washington, D.C. 20530. 14 5. 15 16 The Clerk of Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. 6. From this point forward, Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendant or, if appearance has been 17 entered by counsel, upon the attorney, a copy of every pleading, motion or other 18 document submitted for consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the 19 original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct 20 copy of the document was personally served or sent by mail to the defendants or counsel 21 for the defendants. The court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or 22 magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a 23 district judge, magistrate judge or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate of service. 24 25 26 Dated this 24th day of May, 2012. ________________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?