Farring v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

Filing 75

ORDER Granting 57 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply to 52 Motion in Limine and Granting 72 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply to 61 Motion in Limine. Respective Replies due within 7 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 01/23/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8

LOUIS RANDOLPH FARRING,

9
10
11
12
13

2:12-CV-479 JCM (PAL)

Plaintiff,
v.
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

14
15

ORDER

16

Presently before the court is defendant Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s motion for leave

17

to file reply in support of a motion in limine. (Doc. # 57). Also before the court is plaintiff Louis

18

Randolph Farring’s motion for leave to file a reply in support of a motion in limine. (Doc. # 72).

19

These motions have been filed pursuant to Local Rule 16-3(b), which states that “[r]eplies will be

20

allowed only with leave of the [c]ourt.”

21

Each party states that a reply is warranted on their respective motion in limine in order to

22

clarify misstatements and misrepresentations in the other’s response. Further, each says that giving

23

leave for their own to reply will not prejudice the other.

24

Good cause appearing,

25

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Hartford Fire

26

Insurance Company’s motion for leave to file reply in support of a motion in limine (doc. # 57) be,

27

and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1
2
3
4
5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Louis Randolph Farring’s motion for leave to file
a reply in support of a motion in limine (doc. # 72) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the parties file their respective replies within seven days
of entry of this order.
DATED January 23, 2014.

6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-