United States of America v. Outlaw
Filing
9
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff United States of America against Defendant Edward M Outlaw in the amount of $13,144.10. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
Nevada Bar #2137
United States Attorney
CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
Assistant United States Attorney
333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 388-6336
Fax: (702) 388-6787
E-mail: Carlos.Gonzalez2@usdoj.gov
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
***
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
EDWARD M. OUTLAW, MD,
14
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
2:10-CV-00485-KJD-(CWH)
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
15
16
This cause came before the Court upon the application of The United States for
17
judgment by default against the defendant, Edward M. Outlaw, MD. The United States
18
appearing by and through Carlos A. Gonzalez, Assistant United States Attorney for the
19
District of Nevada. Defendant failed to appear. The Court being fully advised in the
20
premises, FINDS THAT:
(A)
22
23
This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this
(B)
21
Defendant, Edward M. Outlaw, MD, was duly served a copy of the Summons
action;
24
and Complaint in the action within the District of Nevada on March 23, 2012, pursuant to
25
Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of the United States Waiver of
26
the Service of Summon and Return is on file;
1
2
3
4
(C)
Defendant has failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend herein within the
time allowed;
(D)
No stipulation or order has been filed extending the time for the defendant to
plead or otherwise defend;
5
(E)
Defendant is now in default and a clerk’s Entry of Default is now on file;
6
(F)
Defendant is not an infant or incompetent person and not in the military
7
8
9
10
service with the purview of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, as amended;
(G)
Defendant is indebted to the United States by reason of the default in
repaying the student loan(s);
(H)
Subsequently, said Note was assigned to the United States of America. The
11
United States is now the owner and holder of said Note. Defendant has failed to pay said
12
Note according to the terms thereof;
13
(I)
There is due and owing to the United States from Defendant the sum of
14
$13,102.64 principal and $41.46 interest as of July 1, 2011. Interest shall accrue at the
15
legal rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961(a) and be computed daily and compounded
16
annually until paid in full, and United States District Court docket fees in the amount of
17
$350.00 as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2) , plus costs of suit as subsequently taxed;
18
(J)
The allegations of the Complaint are sustained by the evidence and are
19
hereby adopted as findings of fact. The Court concludes as a matter of law that the United
20
States is entitled to the relief demanded in the Complaint.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that The United
22
States of America should have, and it is hereby granted, judgment against the Defendant
23
in the amount of $13,144.10, plus interest from July 1, 2011, at the rate of 2.10% percent
24
25
per annum ($0.76 per day) on the unpaid principal until date of judgment. All loans will
0.18%
from date of judgment compounded
accrue interest at the legal rate of
26
annually until the judgment and interest are paid in full pursuant to the provision of
2
1
28 U.S.C. §1961(a), and United States Court Docket Fees in the amount of $350.00, plus
2
costs of this action.
3
4
DATED this 14th day of
December
, 2012.
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
Submitted by:
7
8
DANIEL G.. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
9
10
//S// CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
Assistant U. S. Attorney
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?