Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Wynn et al

Filing 125

ORDER ON STIPULATION Granting 123 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to File Motion to Amend Derivative Complaint and set Briefing Schedule. Amended Complaint deadline: 3/18/2013. Motions due by 3/18/2013. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

John P. Aldrich, Esq. (SBN #6877)
ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.
1601 S. Rainbow Blvd., SUITE 160
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

SCOTT+SCOTT LLP
Joseph P. Guglielmo (pro hac vice)
Donald A. Broggi (pro hac vice)
500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, New York 10110
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page.]

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

15
16
17
18

LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Derivatively and on Behalf of Nominal
Defendant Wynn Resorts, Limited,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21

v.
STEPHEN A. WYNN, et al.,

22
23

Defendants,
and

24
25

WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED, a Nevada
corporation,

26

Nominal Defendant.

27
28

1701523.1

Case No. 2:12-CV-509-JCM (GWF)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE MOTION
TO AMEND DERIVATIVE
COMPLAINT AND SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

1
2

WHEREAS, on August 6, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Verified Consolidated Derivative
Complaint;

3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, on February 1, 2013, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss the Consolidated Derivative Complaint and directing Plaintiffs to file a Motion to Amend
pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 annexing their Proposed Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative
Complaint within thirty days from the date of that Order;

7
8

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 and Proposed
Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint are currently due on March 4, 2013;

9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, have agreed to (1)
extend Plaintiffs’ time for filing their Motion to Amend by fourteen (14) days and, in the event the
Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend, (2) establish a briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motions
to Dismiss the Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint;

13
14

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Plaintiffs and Defendants,
through their undersigned counsel, subject to Court approval, as follows:

15
16

1.

Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint no later than March 18, 2013.

17
18

2.

3.

23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiffs’ Opposition will be filed 45 days from the filing of Defendants’ Motion(s);

4.

20

22

In the event the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend, Defendants shall have 45

days to move or answer with respect to the Amended Verified Consolidated Derivative Complaint;

19

21

Plaintiffs shall file their Motion to Amend pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 and Proposed

Defendants’ Replies will be filed 30 days from the filing of Plaintiffs’ Opposition(s);

and
///
///
///
///
///
///

28
1
1701523.1

1
2

5.

Defendants reserve the right to oppose Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend.

Dated: March 1, 2013

Respectfully Submitted,

3
4

By: /s/ John P. Aldrich
John P. Aldrich, Bar No. 6877

5

ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.

6

1601 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 160
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

7

Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

8

and

9

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

10

Joseph P. Guglielmo
Donald A. Broggi
The Chrysler Building
405 Lexington Ave 40th Floor
New York, New York 10174

11
12
13

SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP

14

Anne L. Box
Walter W. Noss
John Jasnoch
707 Broadway, Suite 1000
San Diego, California 92101

15
16
17

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC

18

21

Christopher Lometti
Richard Speirs
Daniel B. Rehns
88 Pine Street, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10005

22

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC

19
20

Daniel S. Sommers
Elizabeth Aniskevich
1100 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20005

23
24
25
26
27
28

2
1701523.1

1

ROBBINS UMEDA LLP

2

Brian J. Robbins
Felipe J. Arroyo
Shane P. Sanders
Gina Stassi
600 B Street, Suite 1900
San Diego, California 92101

3
4
5
6

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee

7

and

8

KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK LLP

9
10

Robin Winchester
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087

11

Counsel for Maryanne Solak

12

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

13
14

By: /s/ Debra L. Spinelli
James J. Pisanelli, Bar No. 4027
Todd L. Bice, Bar No. 4534
Debra L. Spinelli, Bar No. 9695
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 800
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

15
16
17
18

and

19

Paul K. Rowe (pro hac vice admitted)
Bradley R. Wilson (pro hac vice admitted)
Grant R. Mainland (pro hac vice admitted)

20
21

WACHTELL LIPTON ROSEN & KATZ

22
23

51 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019

24

and

25
26
27
28
3
1701523.1

1

Robert L. Shapiro (pro hac vice admitted)

2

GLASER WEILL FINK JACOBS HOWARD
AVCHEN & SHAPIRO, LLP

3

10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067

4
5

7

Attorneys for Defendants Linda Chen, Ray R. Irani,
Russell Goldsmith, Robert J. Miller, John A. Moran,
Marc D. Schorr, Alvin V. Shoemaker, D. Boone
Wayson, and Allan Zeman

8

CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS

6

9
By: /s/ J. Colby Williams
Donald J. Campbell, Bar No. 1216
J. Colby Williams, Bar No. 5549
700 South 7th Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendant Stephen A. Wynn

14
15

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON, LLP

16
17

By: /s/ Jeffrey Y. Wu
Ronald L. Olson (pro hac vice admitted)
Mark B. Helm (pro hac vice admitted)
Jeffrey Y. Wu (pro hac vice admitted)
355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071

18
19
20
21

and

22
William R. Urga, Bar No. 1195
23

JOLLEY URGA WIRTH WOODBURY & STANDISH

24

3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, 16th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89169

25

Attorneys for Defendant Elaine P. Wynn

26
27
28
4
1701523.1

1

FENNEMORE CRAIG JONES VARGAS

2
3

By: /s/ Gary Goodheart
Gary R. Goodheart, Esq., Bar No. 1203
Karl L. Nielson, Esq., Bar No. 5082
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Wynn Resorts,
Limited

8
9
10

ORDER

11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE/MAGISTRATE

13
14
15

March 5, 2013
DATED: ______________________

16

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00509-JCM-(GWF)

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
1701523.1