Chlebowski v. Commissioner Of Social Security Adm.
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada by delivering a copy of the 6 Summons and 5 Complaint to the U.S. Ma rshal for service. The Clerk of Court shall also re-serve the United States Attorney General with the 6 Summons and 5 Complaint by certified mail, and file proof of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 01/14/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: USMS for service - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
KEN R. CHLEBOWSKI,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF
)
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00517-MMD-PAL
ORDER
(Mtn to Serve - Dkt. #15)
13
14
15
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Ken R. Chlebowski’s Motion to Serve Party with
Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #15) filed January 8, 2013. The court has considered the Motion.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in forma pauperis. On July 31, 2012, the court entered an
17
Order (Dkt. #4) screening Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. #5) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and directing
18
the Clerk of Court to serve the Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
19
Specifically, the Screening Order directed the Clerk of the Court to issue summons for and serve
20
process upon the Office of General Counsel for the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) in
21
Baltimore, Maryland; and the Attorney General in Washington, D.C.1 See Order (Dkt. #4). The Clerk
22
issued Summons (Dkt. #6) and mailed them with the Complaint to the Office of General Counsel and
23
the Attorney General by certified mail as directed in the Screening Order. See Certified Mail Receipts
24
(Dkt. #7). The docket reflects that service is complete on the Office of General Counsel. See Certified
25
///
26
1
27
28
Additionally, in an Order (Dkt. #11) entered October 24, 2012, the court directed service on the
Office of Regional Chief Counsel for Region IX of the Social Security Administration in San Francisco,
California, pursuant to 70 Fed. Reg. 73320 (Dec. 9, 2005). The Clerk complied, and service was
returned executed. See Summons Returned Executed (Dkt. #13).
1
Mail Return Receipt (Dkt. #10). No certified mail return receipt has been entered on the docket
2
confirming service on the United States Attorney General.
3
Additionally, the Screening Order directed the Clerk of Court to issue summons to the United
4
States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons to the U.S. Marshal for service.
5
The Clerk issued Summons (Dkt. #6-2), but the docket does not reflect that it was delivered with the
6
Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service or that the U.S. Marshal has effected service of process on
7
the United States Attorney. The Motion represents that Plaintiff has not received confirmation of
8
service on the U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada and seeks an order directing the Clerk re-serve
9
him.
10
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
11
IT IS ORDERED:
12
1.
13
14
Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #15) is
GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada
15
by delivering a copy of the Summons (Dkt. #6-2) and Complaint (Dkt. #5) to the U.S.
16
Marshal for service.
17
3.
The Clerk of Court shall also re-serve the United States Attorney General with the
18
Summons (Dkt. #6) and Complaint (Dkt. #5) by certified mail, and file proof of service
19
or file proof of service if it has been effected.
20
Dated this 14th day of January, 2013.
21
22
23
________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?