Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services Inc.

Filing 117

ORDER that 115 Notice of Appearance and 116 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney are DENIED without prejudice. Counsel shall submit a substitution of attorneys that complies with the provisions of LR 10-6(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/5/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 FLEMMING KRISTENSEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-00528-APG-PAL ORDER 11 12 Before the court is attorneys Steven Martin Aaron, Gregory T. Wolf, and the Law Firm of 13 Dentons US LLP and Martin L. Welsh’s Notice of Appearance (Dkt. #115), and Attorney Timothy 14 Walton’s Notice of Withdrawal (Dkt. #116). It appears from a review of the documents, that attorneys 15 Steven Martin Aaron, Gregory T. Wolf, and the Law Firm of Dentons US LLP and Law Offices of 16 Hayes & Welsh are attempting to substitute in as counsel for Defendant Credit Payment Services, Inc., 17 in the place of Timothy Walton. LR IA 10-6 governs appearances, substitutions and withdrawals of 18 counsel in this district. LR IA 10-6 (b) prohibits an attorney from withdrawing after appearing in a case 19 except by leave of Court with notice to the client and opposing counsel. LR IA 10-6 (c) requires that 20 “any stipulation to substitute attorneys shall be by leave of Court and shall bear the signatures of the 21 attorneys and of the client represented.” The notices do not contain the signature of the client, and are 22 not effective without the client’s signature and the court’s order. 23 Additionally, the signature of an attorney to substitute “constitutes an express acceptance of all 24 dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or any other Court 25 order.” LR IA 10-6 (c). Finally, LR IA 10-6 (d) provides that withdrawal or substitution of an attorney 26 “shall not alone be a reason for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in the 27 case.” The Plaintiff filed a Motion to Certify Class (Dkt #113) October 31, 2013. Responses are due 28 November 17, 2013. 1 IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 6 The Notice of Appearance (Dkt. #115), and A Notice of Withdrawal (Dkt. #116) are DENIED without prejudice. 2. Counsel shall submit a substitution of attorneys that complies with the provisions of LR 10-6(c), Dated this 5th of November, 2013. 7 8 9 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?