Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services Inc.
Filing
117
ORDER that 115 Notice of Appearance and 116 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney are DENIED without prejudice. Counsel shall submit a substitution of attorneys that complies with the provisions of LR 10-6(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/5/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
FLEMMING KRISTENSEN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00528-APG-PAL
ORDER
11
12
Before the court is attorneys Steven Martin Aaron, Gregory T. Wolf, and the Law Firm of
13
Dentons US LLP and Martin L. Welsh’s Notice of Appearance (Dkt. #115), and Attorney Timothy
14
Walton’s Notice of Withdrawal (Dkt. #116). It appears from a review of the documents, that attorneys
15
Steven Martin Aaron, Gregory T. Wolf, and the Law Firm of Dentons US LLP and Law Offices of
16
Hayes & Welsh are attempting to substitute in as counsel for Defendant Credit Payment Services, Inc.,
17
in the place of Timothy Walton. LR IA 10-6 governs appearances, substitutions and withdrawals of
18
counsel in this district. LR IA 10-6 (b) prohibits an attorney from withdrawing after appearing in a case
19
except by leave of Court with notice to the client and opposing counsel. LR IA 10-6 (c) requires that
20
“any stipulation to substitute attorneys shall be by leave of Court and shall bear the signatures of the
21
attorneys and of the client represented.” The notices do not contain the signature of the client, and are
22
not effective without the client’s signature and the court’s order.
23
Additionally, the signature of an attorney to substitute “constitutes an express acceptance of all
24
dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or any other Court
25
order.” LR IA 10-6 (c). Finally, LR IA 10-6 (d) provides that withdrawal or substitution of an attorney
26
“shall not alone be a reason for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in the
27
case.” The Plaintiff filed a Motion to Certify Class (Dkt #113) October 31, 2013. Responses are due
28
November 17, 2013.
1
IT IS ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
4
5
6
The Notice of Appearance (Dkt. #115), and A Notice of Withdrawal (Dkt. #116) are
DENIED without prejudice.
2.
Counsel shall submit a substitution of attorneys that complies with the provisions of
LR 10-6(c),
Dated this 5th of November, 2013.
7
8
9
______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?