Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services Inc.
Filing
182
ORDER Granting 181 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Oral Argument on 176 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 05/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
FLEMMING KRISTENSEN, individually,
and on behalf of a class of similarly situated
individuals,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC.,
a Nevada corporation,
f/k/a MYCASHNOW.COM INC.,
ENOVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
an Illinois corporation,
PIONEER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
a Missouri corporation,
LEADPILE LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company, and
CLICKMEDIA, LLC d/b/a NET1PROMOTIONS
LLC, a Georgia limited liability company,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Defendants.
18
21
22
25
26
27
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES,
INC.'S REQUEST FOR ITS LEAD
COUNSEL TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY AT ORAL
ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANTS’
SECOND JOINT MOTION TO
EXTEND THE DEADLINES FOR
DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS, AND PROPOSED JOINT
PRETRIAL ORDER
DATE: May 29, 2014
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
CTRM: LV Courtroom 3B
JUDGE: The Hon. Peggy A. Leen
Telephonically at Oral Argument on Defendants’ Second Joint Motion to Extend the Deadlines for
Discovery, Dispositive Motions, and Proposed Joint Pretrial Order scheduled for Thursday, May
29, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED:
CPS's lead counsel may appear telephonically at the oral argument scheduled for Thursday,
23
24
Case No. 2:12-CV-00528-APG (PAL)
Before this Court is Defendant Credit Payment Services, Inc. (“CPS”)’s Request to Appear
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
May 29, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. In advance of the hearing, counsel for CPS shall contact the Court to
arrange for the telephonic appearance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 19, 2014
Dated: ___________________
The Honorable Peggy A. Leen
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
82245481\V-1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?