Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services Inc.

Filing 270

ORDER denying without prejudice 260 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/18/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 FLEMMING KRISTENSEN, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:12-cv-00528-APG-PAL Plaintiff, v. ORDER (Mtn to Seal – Dkt. #260) CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 This matter is before the court on Defendant LeadPile LLC’s Motion for Leave to File 14 Documents Under Seal (Dkt. #260) filed November 14, 2014. The court has considered the 15 Motion. 16 Defendant LeadPile seeks an order pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Practice 10-5(b), to 17 file Exhibit A to the Supplemental Declaration of K. Chris Collins (Dkt. #259) to its Motion for 18 Discovery Sanctions (Dkt. #241) under seal. Exhibit A contains excerpted portions of the 19 deposition transcript of Plaintiff Flemming Kristensen, taken January 21, 2014, which was 20 designated confidential pursuant to the Protective Orders (Dkt. ##32, 145) entered by the court to 21 facilitate discovery exchanges in this case. LeadPile asserts that compelling reasons exist to file 22 these transcript pages under seal to “avoid disclosure of confidential or proprietary business 23 information or private, personal information” and because these pages were designated 24 confidential under the Protective Orders. 25 As the court has explained in several previous Orders, LeadPile’s reliance on the 26 Protective Orders is misplaced. See, e.g., Orders (Dkt. ##217, 229, 255). The Protective Orders 27 provide that their purpose is to facilitate discovery exchanges. See Protective Order (Dkt. #32) at 28 ¶ 1; Amended Protective Order (Dkt. #145) at ¶ 1. In entering the Protective Orders, the parties 1 did not show, and the court did not find, that any specific documents were secret or confidential. 2 Furthermore, LeadPile’s conclusory assertion that the Exhibit contains “confidential business 3 information and/or personal information” is insufficient to meet its burden of making a 4 particularized showing of good cause for each excerpted page it seeks to file under seal. 5 LeadPile must make the particularized showing for each document it seeks to seal by showing 6 that “specific prejudice or harm will result.” See, e.g., San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. 7 Ct., 187 F.3d 1096, 1103 (9th Cir. 1999). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by 8 specific examples or articulated reasoning do not satisfy the Rule 26(c) test.” Foltz v. State Farm 9 Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003 (citing Beckman Ind., Inc. v. Internat’l 10 Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992)). LeadPile has not asserted or shown specific harm 11 or prejudice that will result from disclosure of any particular document it seeks to seal. 12 The court appreciates that the Motion to Seal was filed to comply with LeadPile’s 13 obligation to treat documents designated by other parties as confidential, but a statement that 14 other parties have designated these materials as confidential does not establish good cause for 15 sealing the documents attached to a non-dispositive filing as required by the Ninth Circuit in 16 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS ORDERED: 19 1. Defendant LeadPile’s Motion to Seal (Dkt. #260) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 20 2. The party/parties who designated the excerpted pages attached as Exhibit A to the 21 Supplemental Declaration of K. Chris Collins (Dkt. #259) shall have until December 2, 22 2014, to file a memorandum of points and authorities setting forth good cause why these 23 pages should remain under seal. 24 3. Exhibit A to the Supplemental Declaration of K. Chris Collins (Dkt. #260-1) shall remain 25 under seal until December 2, 2014. If the designating party fails to timely comply with 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2- 1 this Order, the Clerk of Court is directed to unseal Exhibit A (Dkt. #260-1) to make it 2 available on the public docket. 3 Dated this 18th day of November, 2014. 4 ___________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?