Romero v. Recontrust Company, N.A.
Filing
21
ORDER Canceling Lis Pendens. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 3
ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8276
ALLISON R. SCHMIDT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10743
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Telephone:
(702) 634-5000
Facsimile:
(702) 380-8572
Email: ariel.stern@akerman.com
Email: allison.schmidt@akerman.com
Attorneys for Defendant
ReconTrust Company, N.A.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
ALEJANDRO ROMERO
Case No.: 2:12-cv-0529-JCM-PAL
11
Plaintiff,
[Proposed]
ORDER CANCELING LIS PENDENS
12
vs.
13
14
RECONTRUST COMPANY; DOES I through X
and ROE CORPORATIONS IX through XX,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
This Court issued an order granting defendant Recontrust Company, N. A.'s ("Defendant")
motion to dismiss [Dkt. 5] on June 5, 2012 [Dkt. 18].
19
20
Defendant requests that the lis pendens currently recorded against the subject property by
plaintiff Alejandro Romero ("Plaintiff") be canceled.
21
The Court finds that Plaintiff recorded a notice of lis pendens against the property located at
22
8436 Justine Court, Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 (APN: 138-16-311-055) on March 2, 2012, as
23
Instrument No. 201203020000651 in the real property records maintained by the Clark County
24
Recorder (“Lis Pendens”). A copy of the Lis Pendens is attached hereto as Exhibit A and fully
25
incorporated by reference.
26
UPON CONSIDERATION of defendants’ request to cancel the Lis Pendens, and good cause
27
appearing therefore, the Court hereby grants defendant its requested relief and rules as follows:
28
///
{24905239;1}
1
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Filed 08/16/12 Page 2 of 3
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Lis Pendens is hereby
cancelled, released, and expunged.
2.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this order canceling
the Lis Pendens has the same effect as an expungement of the original Lis Pendens.
3.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant shall
6
record a properly certified copy of this cancellation order in the real property records of Clark
7
County, Nevada within a reasonable amount of time from the date of this order’s issue.
8
APPROVED:
9
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
Dated: August 22, 2012
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Submitted by:
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
/s/ Allison R. Schmidt
ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8276
ALLISON R. SCHMIDT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10743
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorneys for Defendant
ReconTrust Company, N.A.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{24905239;1}
2
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20
Filed 08/16/12 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on the 16th day of August, 2012 and pursuant to FRCP 5(b), I served via
3
CM/ECF and/or deposited for mailing in the U. S. Mail a true and correct copy of the foregoing
4
[Proposed] ORDER CANCELING LIS PENDENS, postage prepaid and addressed to:
5
7
JOHN PETER LEE, ESQ.
JOHN PETER LEE, LTD.
830 Las Vegas Blvd. South
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
/s/ Judy Berry
An employee of AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
9
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{24905239;1}
3
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20-1
Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 4
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20-1
Filed 08/16/12 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20-1
Filed 08/16/12 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:12-cv-00529-JCM -PAL Document 20-1
Filed 08/16/12 Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?